Concept Search

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E39 Actor or Actors who surrender custody of an instance of E18 Physical Thing in an E10 Transfer of Custody activity.

The property will typically describe an Actor surrendering custody of an object when it is handed over to someone else’s care. On occasion, physical custody may be surrendered involuntarily – through accident, loss or theft.

In reality, custody is either transferred to someone or from someone, or both.

• the Secure Deliveries Inc. crew (E40) surrendered custody through The delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10).

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the Secure Deliveries Inc. crew (E40) surrendered custody through The delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10).

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the Secure Deliveries Inc. crew (E74) surrendered custody through The delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10).

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• representatives of The National Gallery (E40) received custody through.  The delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E39 Actor or Actors who receive custody of an instance of E18 Physical Thing in an E10 Transfer of Custody activity.

The property will typically describe Actors receiving custody of an object when it is handed over from another Actor’s care. On occasion, physical custody may be received involuntarily or illegally – through accident, unsolicited donation, or theft.

In reality, custody is either transferred to someone or from someone, or both.

• representatives of The National Gallery (E40) received custody through. The delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• representatives of The National Gallery (E40) received custody through.  The delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E39 Actor or Actors who receive custody of an instance of E18 Physical Stuff in an E10 Transfer of Custody activity.

The property will typically describe Actors receiving custody of an object when it is handed over from another Actor’s care. On occasion, physical custody may be received involuntarily or illegally – through accident, unsolicited donation, or theft.

In reality, custody is either transferred to someone or from someone, or both.

• representatives of The National Gallery (E40) received custody through. The delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• representatives of The National Gallery (E40) received custody through.  The delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• representatives of The National Gallery (E40) received custody through.  The delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the instance(s) E39 Actor who receive custody of an instance of E18 Physical Thing in an instance of E10 Transfer of Custody.

The property will typically describe Actors receiving custody of an object when it is handed over from another Actor’s care. On occasion, physical custody may be received involuntarily or illegally – through accident, unsolicited donation, or theft.

In reality, custody is either transferred to someone or from someone, or both.

• Representatives of The National Gallery (E74) received custody through the delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10).

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• representatives of The National Gallery (E40) received custody through.  The delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E39 Actor or Actors who receive custody of an instance of E18 Physical Thing in an E10 Transfer of Custody activity.

The property will typically describe Actors receiving custody of an object when it is handed over from another Actor’s care. On occasion, physical custody may be received involuntarily or illegally – through accident, unsolicited donation, or theft.

In reality, custody is either transferred to someone or from someone, or both.

• representatives of The National Gallery (E40) received custody through. The delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• representatives of The National Gallery (E40) received custody through.  The delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• representatives of The National Gallery (E74) received custody through.  The delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10)

Quantification: one to many (0,n,0,1)
Scope note:

This property is a container for all informal descriptions about an object that have not been expressed in terms of CRM constructs.

In particular it captures the characterisation of the item itself, its internal structures, appearance etc.

Like property P2 has type (is type of), this property is a consequence of the restricted focus of the CRM. The aim is not to capture, in a structured form, everything that can be said about an item; indeed, the CRM formalism is not regarded as sufficient to express everything that can be said. Good practice requires use of distinct note fields for different aspects of a characterisation. The P3.1 has type property of P3 has note allows differentiation of specific notes, e.g. “construction”, “decoration” etc.

An item may have many notes, but a note is attached to a specific item.

• coffee mug – OXCMS:1983.1.1 (E19) has note “chipped at edge of handle” (E62) has type Condition (E55)

Quantification: one to many (0,n:0,1)
Scope note:

This property is a container for all informal descriptions about an object that have not been expressed in terms of CRM constructs. In particular it captures the characterisation of the item itself its internal structures appearance etc. Like property P2 has type (is type of) this property is a consequence of the restricted focus of the CRM. The aim is not to capture in a structured form everything that can be said about an item; indeed the CRM formalism is not regarded as sufficient to express everything that can be said. Good practice requires use of distinct note fields for different aspects of a characterisation. The P3.1 has type property of P3 has note allows differentiation of specific notes e.g. “construction” “decoration” etc. An item may have many notes but a note is attached to a specific item.

• coffee mug – OXCMS:1983.1.1 (E19) has note “chipped at edge of handle” (E62) has type Condition (E55)

Quantification: one to many (0,n,0,1)
Scope note:

This property is a container for all informal descriptions about an object that cannot be expressed in terms of CRM constructs.

In particular it captures the characterisation of the item itself, its internal structures, appearance etc.

Like property P2 has type (is type of), this property is a consequence of the restricted focus of the CRM. The aim is not to capture, in a structured form, everything that can be said about an item; indeed, the CRM formalism is not regarded as sufficient to express everything that can be said. Good practice requires use of distinct note fields for different aspects of a characterisation. The P2 has type (is type of) property of P3 has note allows differentiation of specific notes, e.g. “construction”, “decoration” etc.

An item may have many notes, but a note is attached to a specific item.

• coffee mug – OXCMS:1983.1.1 (E19) has note chipped at edge of handle (E62) has type Condition (E55)

Quantification: one to many (0,n:0,1)
Scope note:

This property is a container for all informal descriptions about an object that have not been expressed in terms of CRM constructs. In particular it captures the characterisation of the item itself its internal structures appearance etc. Like property P2 has type (is type of) this property is a consequence of the restricted focus of the CRM. The aim is not to capture in a structured form everything that can be said about an item; indeed the CRM formalism is not regarded as sufficient to express everything that can be said. Good practice requires use of distinct note fields for different aspects of a characterisation. The P3.1 has type property of P3 has note allows differentiation of specific notes e.g. “construction” “decoration” etc. An item may have many notes but a note is attached to a specific item.

• coffee mug – OXCMS:1983.1.1 (E19) has note “chipped at edge of handle” (E62) has type Condition (E55)

Quantification: one to many (0,n:0,1)
Scope note:

This property is a container for all informal descriptions about an object that have not been expressed in terms of CRM constructs. In particular it captures the characterisation of the item itself its internal structures appearance etc. Like property P2 has type (is type of) this property is a consequence of the restricted focus of the CRM. The aim is not to capture in a structured form everything that can be said about an item; indeed the CRM formalism is not regarded as sufficient to express everything that can be said. Good practice requires use of distinct note fields for different aspects of a characterisation. The P3.1 has type property of P3 has note allows differentiation of specific notes e.g. “construction” “decoration” etc. An item may have many notes but a note is attached to a specific item.

• coffee mug – OXCMS:1983.1.1 (E19) has note “chipped at edge of handle” (E62) has type Condition (E55)

Quantification: one to many (0,n,0,1)
Scope note:

This property is a container for all informal descriptions about an object that have not been expressed in terms of CIDOC CRM constructs.

In particular, it captures the characterisation of the item itself, its internal structures, appearance etc.

Like property P2 has type (is type of), this property is a consequence of the restricted focus of the CIDOC CRM. The aim is not to capture, in a structured form, everything that can be said about an item; indeed, the CIDOC CRM formalism is not regarded as sufficient to express everything that can be said. Good practice requires use of distinct note fields for different aspects of a characterisation. The P3.1 has type property of P3 has note allows differentiation of specific notes, e.g., “construction”, “decoration” etc.

An item may have many notes, but a note is attached to a specific item.

• Coffee mug – OXCMS:1983.1.1 (E19) has note “chipped at edge of handle” (E62) has type Condition (E55). (fictitious)

Quantification: one to many (0,n:0,1)
Scope note:

This property is a container for all informal descriptions about an object that have not been expressed in terms of CRM constructs. In particular it captures the characterisation of the item itself its internal structures appearance etc. Like property P2 has type (is type of) this property is a consequence of the restricted focus of the CRM. The aim is not to capture in a structured form everything that can be said about an item; indeed the CRM formalism is not regarded as sufficient to express everything that can be said. Good practice requires use of distinct note fields for different aspects of a characterisation. The P3.1 has type property of P3 has note allows differentiation of specific notes e.g. “construction” “decoration” etc. An item may have many notes but a note is attached to a specific item.

• coffee mug – OXCMS:1983.1.1 (E19) has note “chipped at edge of handle” (E62) has type Condition (E55)

Quantification: one to many (0,n,0,1)
Scope note:

This property is a container for all informal descriptions about an object that have not been expressed in terms of CRM constructs.

In particular it captures the characterisation of the item itself, its internal structures, appearance etc.

Like property P2 has type (is type of), this property is a consequence of the restricted focus of the CRM. The aim is not to capture, in a structured form, everything that can be said about an item; indeed, the CRM formalism is not regarded as sufficient to express everything that can be said. Good practice requires use of distinct note fields for different aspects of a characterisation. The P3.1 has type property of P3 has note allows differentiation of specific notes, e.g. “construction”, “decoration” etc.

An item may have many notes, but a note is attached to a specific item.

• coffee mug – OXCMS:1983.1.1 (E19) has note “chipped at edge of handle” (E62) has type Condition (E55)

Quantification: one to many (0,n:0,1)
Scope note:

This property is a container for all informal descriptions about an object that have not been expressed in terms of CRM constructs. In particular it captures the characterisation of the item itself its internal structures appearance etc. Like property P2 has type (is type of) this property is a consequence of the restricted focus of the CRM. The aim is not to capture in a structured form everything that can be said about an item; indeed the CRM formalism is not regarded as sufficient to express everything that can be said. Good practice requires use of distinct note fields for different aspects of a characterisation. The P3.1 has type property of P3 has note allows differentiation of specific notes e.g. “construction” “decoration” etc. An item may have many notes but a note is attached to a specific item.

• coffee mug – OXCMS:1983.1.1 (E19) has note “chipped at edge of handle” (E62) has type Condition (E55)

Quantification: one to many (0,n:0,1)
Scope note:

This property is a container for all informal descriptions about an object that have not been expressed in terms of CIDOC CRM constructs.

In particular, it captures the characterisation of the item itself, its internal structures, appearance etc.

Like property P2 has type (is type of), this property is a consequence of the restricted focus of the CIDOC CRM. The aim is not to capture, in a structured form, everything that can be said about an item; indeed, the CIDOC CRM formalism is not regarded as sufficient to express everything that can be said. Good practice requires use of distinct note fields for different aspects of a characterisation. The P3.1 has type property of P3 has noteallows differentiation of specific notes, e.g., “construction”, “decoration” etc.

An item may have many notes, but a note is attached to a specific item.

• coffee mug – OXCMS:1983.1.1 (E19) has note “chipped at edge of handle” (E62) has type Condition (E55)

Quantification: one to many (0,n:0,1)
Scope note:

This property is a container for all informal descriptions about an object that have not been expressed in terms of CRM constructs. In particular it captures the characterisation of the item itself its internal structures appearance etc. Like property P2 has type (is type of) this property is a consequence of the restricted focus of the CRM. The aim is not to capture in a structured form everything that can be said about an item; indeed the CRM formalism is not regarded as sufficient to express everything that can be said. Good practice requires use of distinct note fields for different aspects of a characterisation. The P3.1 has type property of P3 has note allows differentiation of specific notes e.g. “construction” “decoration” etc. An item may have many notes but a note is attached to a specific item.

• coffee mug – OXCMS:1983.1.1 (E19) has note “chipped at edge of handle” (E62) has type Condition (E55)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10) transferred custody of paintings from The Iveagh Bequest (E19)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies an item or items of E18 Physical Thing concerned in an E10 Transfer of Custody activity.

The property will typically describe the object that is handed over by an E39 Actor to another Actor’s custody. On occasion, physical custody may be transferred involuntarily or illegally – through accident, unsolicited donation, or theft.

• the delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10) transferred custody of paintings from The Iveagh Bequest (E19)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10) transferred custody of paintings from The Iveagh Bequest (E19)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies an item or items of E18 Physical Stuff concerned in an E10 Transfer of Custody activity.

The property will typically describe the object that is handed over by an E39 Actor to another Actor’s custody. On occasion, physical custody may be transferred involuntarily or illegally – through accident, unsolicited donation, or theft.

• the delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10) transferred custody of paintings from The Iveagh Bequest (E19)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10) transferred custody of paintings from The Iveagh Bequest (E19)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10) transferred custody of paintings from The Iveagh Bequest (E19)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the instance(s) of E18 Physical Thing concerned in an instance of E10 Transfer of Custody.

The property will typically describe the object that is handed over by an instance of E39 Actor to to the custody of another instance of E39 Actor. On occasion, physical custody may be transferred involuntarily or illegally – through accident, unsolicited donation, or theft.

• The delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10) transferred custody of paintings from The Iveagh Bequest (E19).

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10) transferred custody of paintings from The Iveagh Bequest (E19)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies an item or items of E18 Physical Thing concerned in an E10 Transfer of Custody activity.

The property will typically describe the object that is handed over by an E39 Actor to another Actor’s custody. On occasion, physical custody may be transferred involuntarily or illegally – through accident, unsolicited donation, or theft.

• the delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10) transferred custody of paintings from The Iveagh Bequest (E19)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10) transferred custody of paintings from The Iveagh Bequest (E19)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the delivery of the paintings by Secure Deliveries Inc. to the National Gallery (E10) transferred custody of paintings from The Iveagh Bequest (E19)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  rebuilding of the Reichstag  (E11) has modified the Reichstag in Berlin (E24)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E24 Physical Man-Made Thing modified in an E11 Modification.

If a modification is applied to a non-man-made object, it is regarded as an E22 Man-Made Object from that time onwards.

• rebuilding of the Reichstag (E11) has modified the Reichstag in Berlin (E24)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  rebuilding of the Reichstag  (E11) has modified the Reichstag in Berlin (E24)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E24 Physical Man-Made Stuff modified in an E11 Modification Event.

If a modification is applied to a non-man-made object, it is regarded as an E22 Man-Made Object from that time onwards.

• rebuilding of the Reichstag (E11) has modified the Reichstag in Berlin (E24)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  rebuilding of the Reichstag  (E11) has modified the Reichstag in Berlin (E24)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  rebuilding of the Reichstag  (E11) has modified the Reichstag in Berlin (E24)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the instance of E18 Physical Thing modified in an instance of E11 Modification.

• The rebuilding of the German Reichstag in Berlin (E11) has modified the Reichstag in Berlin (E24). (Foster, 2000)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  rebuilding of the Reichstag  (E11) has modified the Reichstag in Berlin (E24)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E24 Physical Man-Made Thing modified in an E11 Modification.

If a modification is applied to a non-man-made object, it is regarded as an E22 Man-Made Object from that time onwards.

• rebuilding of the Reichstag (E11) has modified the Reichstag in Berlin (E24)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  rebuilding of the Reichstag  (E11) has modified the Reichstag in Berlin (E24)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  rebuilding of the Reichstag  (E11) has modified the Reichstag in Berlin (E24)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  ornamentation of silver cup 113 (E11) used general technique gold-plating (E55) (Design or Procedure Type)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the technique that was employed in an act of modification.

These techniques should be drawn from an external E55 Type hierarchy of consistent terminology of general techniques such as embroidery, oil-painting, etc. Specific techniques may be further described as instances of E29 Design or Procedure.

• ornamentation of silver cup 113 (E11) used general technique gold-plating (E55) (Design or Procedure Type)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  ornamentation of silver cup 113 (E11) used general technique gold-plating (E55) (Design or Procedure Type)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the technique that was employed in an act of modification.

These techniques should be drawn from an external E55 Type hierarchy of consistent terminology of general techniques such as embroidery, oil-painting, etc. Specific techniques may be further described as instances of E29 Design or Procedure.

• ornamentation of silver cup 113 (E11) used general technique gold-plating (E55) (Design or Procedure Type)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  ornamentation of silver cup 113 (E11) used general technique gold-plating (E55) (Design or Procedure Type)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  ornamentation of silver cup 113 (E11) used general technique gold-plating (E55) (Design or Procedure Type)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the technique or method, modelled as an instance of E55 Type, that was employed in an instance of E7 Activity.

These techniques should be drawn from an external E55 Type hierarchy of consistent terminology of general techniques or methods such as embroidery, oil-painting, carbon dating, etc. Specific documented techniques should be described as instances of E29 Design or Procedure.

• The ornamentation of silver cup 113 (E11) used general technique gold-plating (E55). [A Design or Procedure type] (fictitious)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  ornamentation of silver cup 113 (E11) used general technique gold-plating (E55) (Design or Procedure Type)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the technique that was employed in an act of modification.

These techniques should be drawn from an external E55 Type hierarchy of consistent terminology of general techniques such as embroidery, oil-painting, etc. Specific techniques may be further described as instances of E29 Design or Procedure.

• ornamentation of silver cup 113 (E11) used general technique gold-plating (E55) (Design or Procedure Type)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  ornamentation of silver cup 113 (E11) used general technique gold-plating (E55) (Design or Procedure Type)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  ornamentation of silver cup 113 (E11) used general technique gold-plating (E55)[Design or Procedure Type] (fictitious)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Ornamentation of silver cup 232  (E11) used specific technique ‘Instructions for golden chase work by A N Other’ (E29)
•  Rebuilding of Reichstag (E11) used specific technique Architectural plans by Foster and Partners (E29)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies a specific E29 Design or Procedure used in an E11 Modification.

Modification may be carried out in order to ensure the preservation of an object and not just as part of the creative process.

The property differs from P32 used general technique (was technique of) in that the E29 Design or Procedure referred to is specific and documented rather than simply being a term in the E55 Type hierarchy. Typical examples would include intervention plans for conservation.

• Ornamentation of silver cup 232 (E11) used specific technique ‘Instructions for golden chase work by A N Other’ (E29)
• Rebuilding of Reichstag (E11) used specific technique Architectural plans by Foster and Partners (E29)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Ornamentation of silver cup 232  (E11) used specific technique ‘Instructions for golden chase work by A N Other’ (E29)
•  Rebuilding of Reichstag (E11) used specific technique Architectural plans by Foster and Partners (E29)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies a specific E29 Design or Procedure used in an E11 Modification Event.

Modification may be carried out in order to ensure the preservation of an object and not just as part of the creative process.

The property differs from P32 used general technique (was technique of) in that the E29 Design or Procedure referred to is specific and documented rather than simply being a term in the E55 Type hierarchy. Typical examples would include intervention plans for conservation.

• Ornamentation of silver cup 232 (E11) used specific technique ‘Instructions for golden chase work by A N Other’ (E29)
• Rebuilding of Reichstag (E11) used specific technique Architectural plans by Foster and Partners (E29)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Ornamentation of silver cup 232  (E11) used specific technique ‘Instructions for golden chase work by A N Other’ (E29)
•  Rebuilding of Reichstag (E11) used specific technique Architectural plans by Foster and Partners (E29)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Ornamentation of silver cup 232  (E11) used specific technique ‘Instructions for golden chase work by A N Other’ (E29)
•  Rebuilding of Reichstag (E11) used specific technique Architectural plans by Foster and Partners (E29)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies a specific instance of E29 Design or Procedure in order to carry out an instance of E7 Activity or parts of it.

The property differs from P32 used general technique (was technique of) in that P33 refers to an instance of E29 Design or Procedure, which is a concrete information object in its own right rather than simply being a term or a method known by tradition.

Typical examples would include intervention plans for conservation or the construction plans of a building.

• The ornamentation of silver cup 232 (E11) used specific technique ‘Instructions for golden chase work by A N Other’ (E29). (fictitious)
• The rebuilding of the German Reichstag in Berlin (E11) used specific technique Architectural plans by Foster and Partners (E29). (Foster, 2000)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Ornamentation of silver cup 232  (E11) used specific technique ‘Instructions for golden chase work by A N Other’ (E29)
•  Rebuilding of Reichstag (E11) used specific technique Architectural plans by Foster and Partners (E29)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies a specific E29 Design or Procedure used in an E11 Modification.

Modification may be carried out in order to ensure the preservation of an object and not just as part of the creative process.

The property differs from P32 used general technique (was technique of) in that the E29 Design or Procedure referred to is specific and documented rather than simply being a term in the E55 Type hierarchy. Typical examples would include intervention plans for conservation.

• Ornamentation of silver cup 232 (E11) used specific technique ‘Instructions for golden chase work by A N Other’ (E29)
• Rebuilding of Reichstag (E11) used specific technique Architectural plans by Foster and Partners (E29)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Ornamentation of silver cup 232  (E11) used specific technique ‘Instructions for golden chase work by A N Other’ (E29)
•  Rebuilding of Reichstag (E11) used specific technique Architectural plans by Foster and Partners (E29)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Ornamentation of silver cup 232  (E11) used specific technique ‘Instructions for golden chase work by A N Other’ (E29) (fictitious) 
•  Rebuilding of Reichstag (E11) used specific technique Architectural plans by Foster and Partners (E29) (Foster, 2000)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  1997 condition assessment of the silver collection (E14) concerned silver cup 232 (E22)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E18 Physical Thing that was assessed during an E14 Condition Assessment activity.

Conditions may be assessed either by direct observation or using recorded evidence. In the latter case the E18 Physical Thing does not need to be present or extant.

• 1997 condition assessment of the silver collection (E14) concerned silver cup 232 (E22)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  1997 condition assessment of the silver collection (E14) concerned silver cup 232 (E22)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E18 Physical Stuff that was assessed during an E14 Condition Assessment activity.

Conditions may be assessed either by direct observation or using recorded evidence. In the latter case the E18 Physical Stuff does not need to be present or extant.

• 1997 condition assessment of the silver collection (E14) concerned silver cup 232 (E22)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  1997 condition assessment of the silver collection (E14) concerned silver cup 232 (E22)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  1997 condition assessment of the silver collection (E14) concerned silver cup 232 (E22)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the instance of E18 Physical Thing that was assessed during an instance of E14 Condition Assessment activity.

Conditions may be assessed either by direct observation or using recorded evidence. In the latter case the instance of E18 Physical Thing does not need to be present or extant at the time of assessment.

• The condition assessment of the silver collection in 1997 (E14) concerned silver cup 232 (E22). (fictitious)
• The condition assessment of the cover of MS Sinai Greek 418 (E14) concerned the cover of MS Sinai Greek 418 (E22). (Honey and Pickwoad, 2010)
• The condition assessment of the endband cores of MS Sinai Greek 418 (E14) concerned the endband cores of MS Sinai Greek 418 (E22). (Honey and Pickwoad, 2010)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  1997 condition assessment of the silver collection (E14) concerned silver cup 232 (E22)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E18 Physical Thing that was assessed during an E14 Condition Assessment activity.

Conditions may be assessed either by direct observation or using recorded evidence. In the latter case the E18 Physical Thing does not need to be present or extant.

• 1997 condition assessment of the silver collection (E14) concerned silver cup 232 (E22)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  1997 condition assessment of the silver collection (E14) concerned silver cup 232 (E22)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  1997 condition assessment of the silver collection (E14) concernedsilver cup 232 (E22) (fictitious)
• the condition assessment of the cover of MS Sinai Greek 418 (E14) concernedthe cover of MS Sinai Greek 418 (E22) (Honey and Pickwoad, 2010)
• the condition assessment of the endband cores of MS Sinai Greek 418 (E14) concernedthe endband cores of MS Sinai Greek 418 (E22) (Honey and Pickwoad, 2010)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E3 Condition State that was observed in an E14 Condition Assessment activity.

•  1997 condition assessment of silver cup 232 (E14) has identified oxidation traces were present in 1997 (E3) has type oxidation traces (E55)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E3 Condition State that was observed in an E14 Condition Assessment activity.

• 1997 condition assessment of silver cup 232 (E14) has identified oxidation traces were present in 1997 (E3) has type oxidation traces (E55)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E3 Condition State that was observed in an E14 Condition Assessment activity.

•  1997 condition assessment of silver cup 232 (E14) has identified oxidation traces were present in 1997 (E3) has type oxidation traces (E55)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E3 Condition State that was observed in an E14 Condition Assessment activity.

• 1997 condition assessment of silver cup 232 (E14) has identified oxidation traces were present in 1997 (E3) has type oxidation traces (E55)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E3 Condition State that was observed in an E14 Condition Assessment activity.

•  1997 condition assessment of silver cup 232 (E14) has identified oxidation traces were present in 1997 (E3) has type oxidation traces (E55)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E3 Condition State that was observed in an E14 Condition Assessment activity.

•  1997 condition assessment of silver cup 232 (E14) has identified oxidation traces were present in 1997 (E3) has type oxidation traces (E55)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the instance of E3 Condition State that was observed in an instance of E14 Condition Assessment activity.

• The condition assessment of silver cup 232 in 1997 (E14) has identified oxidation traces were present in 1997 (E3). [which has type (P2) with oxidation traces (E55)] (fictitious)
• The condition assessment of the cover of MS Sinai Greek 418 (E13) has identified the condition state in November 2003 (E3). [which has type fine (E55)] (Honey and Pickwoad, 2010)
• The condition assessment of the endband cores of MS Sinai Greek 418 (E14) has identified the condition state in November 2003 (E3). [which has type broken (E55)] (Honey and Pickwoad, 2010)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E3 Condition State that was observed in an E14 Condition Assessment activity.

•  1997 condition assessment of silver cup 232 (E14) has identified oxidation traces were present in 1997 (E3) has type oxidation traces (E55)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E3 Condition State that was observed in an E14 Condition Assessment activity.

• 1997 condition assessment of silver cup 232 (E14) has identified oxidation traces were present in 1997 (E3) has type oxidation traces (E55)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the E3 Condition State that was observed in an E14 Condition Assessment activity.

•  1997 condition assessment of silver cup 232 (E14) has identified oxidation traces were present in 1997 (E3) has type oxidation traces (E55)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the instance of E3 Condition State that was observed in an instance of E14 Condition Assessment activity.

• 1997 condition assessment of silver cup 232 (E14) has identified oxidation traces were present in 1997 (E3) has type oxidation traces (E55) (fictitious)
• the condition assessment of the cover of MS Sinai Greek 418 (E13) has identifiedthe condition state in November 2003 (E3) [which has typefine (E55)] (Honey and Pickwoad, 2010)
• the condition assessment of the endband cores of MS Sinai Greek 418 (E14) has identifiedthe condition state in November 2003 (E3) [which has typebroken (E55)] (Honey and Pickwoad, 2010)

Quantification: many to one,necessary (1,1,0,n)
Scope note:

This property indicates the physical object to which an identifier is assigned.

P47 is identified by (identifies) - a property of an E19 Physical Object - is a short cut of the fully developed path from E19 Physical Object through P36, E15 Identifier Assignment, P37 assigned (was assigned by) to E42 Object Identifier

• 01 June 1997 Identifier Assignment of the silver cup donated by Martin Doerr (E15) registered silver cup 232 (E19)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  01 June 1997 Identifier Assignment of the silver cup donated by Martin Doerr (E15) assigned “232” (E42)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property records the identifier that was assigned to an item in an Identifier Assignment activity.

The same identifier may be assigned on more than one occasion.

An Identifier might be created prior to an assignment.

• 01 June 1997 Identifier Assignment of the silver cup donated by Martin Doerr (E15) assigned “232” (E42)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  01 June 1997 Identifier Assignment of the silver cup donated by Martin Doerr (E15) assigned “232” (E42)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property records the identifier that was assigned to an object in an Identifier Assignment activity.

P47 is identified by (identifies) - a property of an E19 Physical Object - is a short cut of the fully developed path from E19 Physical Object through P36, E15 Identifier Assignment, P37 assigned (was assigned by) to E42 Object Identifier.

The same identifier may be assigned on more than one occasion.

An Object Identifier might be created prior to an assignment.

• 01 June 1997 Identifier Assignment of the silver cup donated by Martin Doerr (E15) assigned 232 (E42)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  01 June 1997 Identifier Assignment of the silver cup donated by Martin Doerr (E15) assigned “232” (E42)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  01 June 1997 Identifier Assignment of the silver cup donated by Martin Doerr (E15) assigned “232” (E42)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property records the identifier that was assigned to an item in an instance of P37 Identifier Assignment.

The same identifier may be assigned on more than one occasion.

An Identifier might be created prior to an assignment.

• The identifier assignment on 1^st of June 1997 of the silver cup donated by Martin Doerr (E15) assigned “232” (E42) (fictitious)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  01 June 1997 Identifier Assignment of the silver cup donated by Martin Doerr (E15) assigned “232” (E42)