Concept Search

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of  E66 Formation with an instance of E74 Group from which the new group was formed preserving a sense of continuity such as in mission, membership or tradition.

•  The formation of the House of Bourbon-Conti in 1581 (E66) was formed from House of Condé (E74)

Quantification: many to many,necessary (2,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E21 Person with another instance of E21 Person who plays the role of the first instance’s parent, regardless of whether the relationship is biological parenthood, assumed or pretended biological parenthood or an equivalent legal status of rights and obligations obtained by a social or legal act.

This property is, among others, a shortcut of the fully developed paths from E21 Person through P98i was born, E67 Birth, P96 by mother to E21 Person, and from E21 Person through P98i was born, E67 Birth, P97 from father to E21 Person.

This property is not transitive.

• Gaius Octavius (E21) has parent Julius Caesar (E21). (Bleicken & Bell, 2015)
• Steve Jobs (E21) has parent Joanne Simpson (E21). [Biological mother] (Isaacson, 2011)
• Steve Jobs (E21) has parent Clara Jobs (E21). [Adoption mother] (Isaacson, 2011)

Quantification: two to many,necessary (2,n:0,n)
Scope note:

Quantification: two to many,necessary (2,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• Gaius Octavius (E29) has parent Julius Caesar (E29)
• Steve Jobs (E29) has parent Joanne Simpson (biological mother)(E29)
• Steve Jobs (E29) has parent Clara Jobs (adoption mother) (E29)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• Gaius Octavius (E21) has parentJulius Caesar (E21)(Bleicken, 2015)
• Steve Jobs (E21) has parentJoanne Simpson [biological mother] (E21)(Isaacson, 2011)
• Steve Jobs (E21) has parentClara Jobs [adoption mother] (E21)(Isaacson, 2011)

Quantification: two to many,necessary (2,n:0,n)
Scope note:

Quantification: two to many,necessary (2,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• Gaius Octavius (E29) has parent Julius Caesar (E29)
• Steve Jobs (E29) has parent Joanne Simpson (biological mother)(E29)
• Steve Jobs (E29) has parent Clara Jobs (adoption mother) (E29)

Quantification: two to many,necessary (2,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• Gaius Octavius (E29) has parent Julius Caesar (E29)
• Steve Jobs (E29) has parent Joanne Simpson (biological mother)(E29)
• Steve Jobs (E29) has parent Clara Jobs (adoption mother) (E29)

Quantification: two to many,necessary (2,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• Gaius Octavius (E29) has parent Julius Caesar (E29)
• Steve Jobs (E29) has parent Joanne Simpson (biological mother)(E29)
• Steve Jobs (E29) has parent Clara Jobs (adoption mother) (E29)

Scope note:

This property connects an E91 Co-Reference Assignment to one of the propositional objects co-referring to the co-reference target

Scope note:

This property connects an E91 Co-Reference Assignment to one of the propositional objects co-referring to the co-reference target

Scope note:

This property connects an E91 Co-Reference Assignment to one of the propositional objects not co-referring to the co-reference target

Scope note:

This property connects an E91 Co-Reference Assignment to one of the propositional objects not co-referring to the co-reference target

Scope note:

This property connects an E91 Co-Reference Assignment to the target of the references that are regarded as co-referring.

Scope note:

This property connects an E91 Co-Reference Assignment to the target of the references that are regarded as co-referring.

Quantification: one to one (1,1:1,1)
Scope note:

Quantification: many to one (0,1,0,n)
Scope note:

This property describes the largest volume in space, an instance of E53 Place, that an instance of E18 Physical Thing has occupied at any time during its existence, with respect to the reference space relative to the physical thing itself. This allows for describing the thing itself as a place that may contain other things, such as a box that may contain coins. In other words, it is the volume that contains all the points which the thing has covered at some time during its existence. The reference space for the associated place must be the one that is permanently at rest (P157 is at rest relative to) relative to the physical thing. For instances of E19 Physical Objects it is the one which is at rest relative to the object itself, i.e., which moves together with the object. For instances of E26 Physical Feature it is one which is at rest relative to the physical feature itself and the surrounding matter immediately connected to it. Therefore, there is a 1:1 relation between the instance E18 Physical Thing and the instance of E53 Place it occupies. We include in the occupied space the space filled by the matter of the physical thing and all its inner spaces.

This property implies the fully developed path from E18 Physical Thing through P196 defines, E92 Spacetime Volume, P161 has spatial projection to E53 Place. However, in contrast to P156 occupies, the property P161 has spatial projection does not constrain the reference space of the referred instance of E53 Place.

In contrast to P156 occupies, for the property P53 has former or current location the following holds:

It does not constrain the reference space of the referred instance of E53 Place.

It identifies a possibly wider instance of E53 Place at which a thing is or has been for some unspecified time span.

If the reference space of the referred instance of E53 Place is not at rest with respect to the physical thing found there, the physical thing may move away after some time to another place and/or may have been at some other place before. The same holds for the fully developed path from E18 Physical Thing through P196 defines, E92 Spacetime Volume, P161 has spatial projection to E53 Place.

• The Saint Titus reliquary (E22) occupies the space of the Saint Titus reliquary (E53). [The reliquary is currently kept in the Saint Titus Church in Heraklion, Crete since 1966 and contains the skull of Saint Titus.] (Fisher & Garvey, 2010)
• Burg Eltz near Koblenz, Germany (E24) occupies the space within the 1661AD outer walls of Burg Eltz (E53). [The castle (English name: Eltz Castle) underwent a series of expansions starting in the 12^th century until it reached its current extent in 1661AD and contains buildings from various periods.]

Quantification: one to one (1,1:1,1)
Scope note:

Quantification: many to one (0,1:0,n)
Scope note:

Subpropert of: E18 Physical Thing. P157i provides reference space for : E53Place

• The Saint Titus reliquaryoccupiesthe space of the Saint Titus reliquary [the reliquary is currently kept in the Saint Titus Church in Heraklion, Crete since 1966 and contains the skull of Saint Titus] (Fisher&Garvey, 2010)
• Burg Eltz near Koblenz, Germany occupiesthe space within the 1661AD outer walls of Burg Eltz (E53) [the castle (English name: Eltz Castle) underwent a series of expansions starting in the 12thcentury until it reached its current extent in 1661AD and contains buildings from various periods]

Quantification: one to one (1,1:1,1)
Scope note:

Quantification: one to one (1,1:1,1)
Scope note:

Quantification: one to one (1,1:1,1)
Scope note:

Quantification: one to one (1,1:1,1)
Scope note:

Quantification: many to many,necessary(1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E53 Place with the instance of E18 Physical Thing that determines a reference space for this instance of E53 Place by being at rest with respect to this reference space. The relative stability of form of an instance of E18 Physical Thing defines its default reference space. The reference space is not spatially limited to the referred thing. For example, a ship determines a reference space in terms of which other ships in its neighbourhood may be described. Larger constellations of matter, such as continental plates, may comprise many physical features that are at rest with them and define the same reference space.

• The spatial extent of the municipality of Athens in 2014 (E53) is at rest relative to The Royal Observatory in Greenwich (E25). (Maunder, 1900)
• The place where Lord Nelson died on H.M.S. Victory (E53) is at rest relative to H.M.S. Victory (E22). (Adkin, 2005)

Quantification: many to many, necessary,dependent(1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E53 Place with the instance of E18 Physical Thing that determines a reference space for this instance of E53 Place by being at rest with respect to this reference space. The relative stability of form of an E18 Physical Thing defines its default reference space. The reference space is not spatially limited to the referred thing. For example, a ship determines a reference space in terms of which other ships in its neighbourhood may be described. Larger constellations of matter, such as continental plates, may comprise many physical features that are at rest with them and define the same reference space.

Superproperty of:  E53 Place. P59i is located on or within: E18 Physical Thing

Quantification: many to many, necessary,dependent(1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E53 Place with the instance of E18 Physical Thing that determines a reference space for this instance of E53 Place by being at rest with respect to this reference space. The relative stability of form of an E18 Physical Thing defines its default reference space. The reference space is not spatially limited to the referred thing. For example, a ship determines a reference space in terms of which other ships in its neighbourhood may be described. Larger constellations of matter, such as continental plates, may comprise many physical features that are at rest with them and define the same reference space.

Superproperty of:  E53 Place. P59i is located on or within: E18 Physical Thing

• The spatial extent of the municipality of Athens in 2014 (E53) is at rest relative to The Royal Observatory in Greenwich (E25)
• The place where Lord Nelson died on H.M.S. Victory (E53) is at rest relative to H.M.S. Victory (E22)

Quantification: many to many, necessary,dependent(1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E53 Place with the instance of E18 Physical Thing that determines a reference space for this instance of E53 Place by being at rest with respect to this reference space. The relative stability of form of an instance of E18 Physical Thing defines its default reference space. The reference space is not spatially limited to the referred thing. For example, a ship determines a reference space in terms of which other ships in its neighbourhood may be described. Larger constellations of matter, such as continental plates, may comprise many physical features that are at rest with them and define the same reference space.

Superproperty of:  E53 Place. P59i is located on or within: E18 Physical Thing

• The spatial extent of the municipality of Athens in 2014 (E53) is at rest relative to The Royal Observatory in Greenwich (E25) (Maunder, 2015)
• The place where Lord Nelson died on H.M.S. Victory (E53) is at rest relative to H.M.S. Victory (E22) (Adkin, 2005)

Quantification: many to many, necessary,dependent(1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E53 Place with the instance of E18 Physical Thing that determines a reference space for this instance of E53 Place by being at rest with respect to this reference space. The relative stability of form of an E18 Physical Thing defines its default reference space. The reference space is not spatially limited to the referred thing. For example, a ship determines a reference space in terms of which other ships in its neighbourhood may be described. Larger constellations of matter, such as continental plates, may comprise many physical features that are at rest with them and define the same reference space.

Superproperty of:  E53 Place. P59i is located on or within: E18 Physical Thing

• The spatial extent of the municipality of Athens in 2014 (E53) is at rest relative to The Royal Observatory in Greenwich (E25)
• The place where Lord Nelson died on H.M.S. Victory (E53) is at rest relative to H.M.S. Victory (E22)

Quantification: many to many, necessary,dependent(1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E53 Place with the instance of E18 Physical Thing that determines a reference space for this instance of E53 Place by being at rest with respect to this reference space. The relative stability of form of an E18 Physical Thing defines its default reference space. The reference space is not spatially limited to the referred thing. For example, a ship determines a reference space in terms of which other ships in its neighbourhood may be described. Larger constellations of matter, such as continental plates, may comprise many physical features that are at rest with them and define the same reference space.

Superproperty of:  E53 Place. P59i is located on or within: E18 Physical Thing

• The spatial extent of the municipality of Athens in 2014 (E53) is at rest relative to The Royal Observatory in Greenwich (E25)
• The place where Lord Nelson died on H.M.S. Victory (E53) is at rest relative to H.M.S. Victory (E22)

Quantification: many to many, necessary,dependent(1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E53 Place with the instance of E18 Physical Thing that determines a reference space for this instance of E53 Place by being at rest with respect to this reference space. The relative stability of form of an E18 Physical Thing defines its default reference space. The reference space is not spatially limited to the referred thing. For example, a ship determines a reference space in terms of which other ships in its neighbourhood may be described. Larger constellations of matter, such as continental plates, may comprise many physical features that are at rest with them and define the same reference space.

Superproperty of:  E53 Place. P59i is located on or within: E18 Physical Thing

• The spatial extent of the municipality of Athens in 2014 (E53) is at rest relative to The Royal Observatory in Greenwich (E25)
• The place where Lord Nelson died on H.M.S. Victory (E53) is at rest relative to H.M.S. Victory (E22)

Quantification: many to many, necessary,dependent(1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E53 Place with the instance of E18 Physical Thing that determines a reference space for this instance of E53 Place by being at rest with respect to this reference space. The relative stability of form of an E18 Physical Thing defines its default reference space. The reference space is not spatially limited to the referred thing. For example, a ship determines a reference space in terms of which other ships in its neighbourhood may be described. Larger constellations of matter, such as continental plates, may comprise many physical features that are at rest with them and define the same reference space.

Superproperty of:  E53 Place. P59i is located on or within: E18 Physical Thing

• The spatial extent of the municipality of Athens in 2014 (E53) is at rest relative to The Royal Observatory in Greenwich (E25)
• The place where Lord Nelson died on H.M.S. Victory (E53) is at rest relative to H.M.S. Victory (E22)

Quantification: many to one, necessary (1,1:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E4 Period with the real (phenomenal) 4 dimensional point set (volume) in spacetime that it has occupied. The associated instance of E92 Spacetime Volume includes the trajectories of the participating physical things during their participation in the instance of E4 Period, the open spaces via which they have interacted and the spaces by which they had the potential to interact during that period or event in the way defined by the type of the respective period or event, such as the air in a meeting room transferring the voices. Another example are the areas controlled by some military power. In general, instances of E4 Period have fuzzy boundaries in spacetime.

Quantification: many to many, necessary,dependent(1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E4 Period with the real that is phenomenal,, 4 dimensional point set or volume in spacetime that it has occupied. The associated instance of E92 Spacetime Volume includes the trajectories of the participating physical things during their participation in the instance of E4 Period. This consists of the open spaces via which they have interacted and the spaces by which they had the potential to interact during that period or event. Such interactions took place  in the way defined by the type of the respective period or event, such as the air in a meeting room transferring the voices. Another example are the areas controlled by some military power. In case of phenomena spreading out over islands or other separated areas, the trajectories necessary for participants to travel between these areas are not regarded as part of the occupied spacetime volumes. Such instances of E4 Period occupy each a limited number of contiguous spacetime volumes, however there must not be a discontinuity in the total timespan covered by these spacetime volumes. The real spacetime volumes occupied by an instance of E4 Period must not be confused with declarations of spacetime approximating the real extent. In general, instances of E4 Period have fuzzy boundaries in spacetime. 

Therefore it cannot be verified, if two different instances of E4 Period occupy exactly the same spacetime volume. We therefore determine that a spacetime volume may only be occupied by one instance of E4 Period.

Quantification: many to one, necessary (1,1:0,n)
Scope note:

This property describes the real (phenomenal) 4 dimensional point sets (volumes) in spacetime that the trajectory of an instance of E18 Physical Thing occupies in spacetime in the course of its existence. We include in the occupied space the space filled by the matter of the physical thing and all its inner spaces.

Quantification: many to many, necessary,dependent(1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property describes the real that is phenomenal, 4 dimensional point sets or volumes  in spacetime that the trajectory of an instance of E18 Physical Thing occupies in the course of its existence. We include in the occupied space the space filled by the matter of the physical thing and all its inner spaces.

Physical things consisting of aggregations of physically unconnected objects, such as a set of chessmen, occupy a number of individually contiguous spacetime volumes equal to the number of unconnected objects that constitute them.

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the writing of this scope note (E7) used specific object Nicholas Crofts’ computer (E22) mode of use Typing Tool; Storage Medium (E55)
• the people of Iraq calling the place identified by TGN ‘7017998’ (E7) used specific object “Quyunjig” (E44) mode of use Current; Vernacular (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property describes the use of material or immaterial things in a way essential to the performance or the outcome of an E7 Activity.

This property typically applies to tools, instruments, moulds, raw materials and items embedded in a product. It implies that the presence of the object in question was a necessary condition for the action. For example, the activity of writing this text required the use of a computer. An immaterial thing can be used if at least one of its carriers is present. For example, the software tools on a computer.

Another example is the use of a particular name by a particular group of people over some span to identify a thing, such as a settlement. In this case, the physical carriers of this name are at least the people understanding its use.

• the writing of this scope note (E7) used specific object Nicholas Crofts’ computer (E22) mode of use Typing Tool; Storage Medium (E55)
• the people of Iraq calling the place identified by TGN ‘7017998’ (E7) used specific object “Quyunjig” (E44) mode of use Current; Vernacular (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the writing of this scope note (E7) used specific object Nicholas Crofts’ computer (E22) mode of use Typing Tool; Storage Medium (E55)
• the people of Iraq calling the place identified by TGN ‘7017998’ (E7) used specific object “Quyunjig” (E44) mode of use Current; Vernacular (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property describes the use of material or immaterial things in a way essential to the performance or the outcome of an E7 Activity.

This property typically applies to tools, instruments, moulds, raw materials and items embedded in a product. It implies that the presence of the object in question was a necessary condition for the action. For example, the activity of writing this text required the use of a computer. An immaterial thing can be used if at least one of its carriers is present. For example, the software tools on a computer.

• the writing of this scope note (E7) used specific object Nicholas Crofts’ computer (E22) mode of use Typing Tool; Storage Medium (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the writing of this scope note (E7) used specific object Nicholas Crofts’ computer (E22) mode of use Typing Tool; Storage Medium (E55)
• the people of Iraq calling the place identified by TGN ‘7017998’ (E7) used specific object “Quyunjig” (E44) mode of use Current; Vernacular (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the writing of this scope note (E7) used specific object Nicholas Crofts’ computer (E22) mode of use Typing Tool; Storage Medium (E55)
• the people of Iraq calling the place identified by TGN ‘7017998’ (E7) used specific object “Quyunjig” (E44) mode of use Current; Vernacular (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property describes the use of material or immaterial things in a way essential to the performance or the outcome of an instance of E7 Activity.

This property typically applies to tools, instruments, moulds, raw materials and items embedded in a product. It implies that the presence of the object in question was a necessary condition for the action. For example, the activity of writing this text required the use of a computer. An immaterial thing can be used if at least one of its carriers is present. For example, the software tools on a computer.

Another example is the use of a particular name by a particular group of people over some span to identify a thing, such as a settlement. In this case, the physical carriers of this name are at least the people understanding its use.

• The writing of the scope note of the CIDOC CRM property “P16 used specific object” contained in the CIDOC CRM version 4.1 (E7) used specific object Nicholas Crofts’ computer (E22) mode of use Typing Tool; Storage Medium (E55). [the original scope note was later extended in the CIDOC CRM version 4.3]
• The people of Iraq calling the place identified by TGN ‘7017998’ (E7) used specific object “Quyunjig” (E41) mode of use current; vernacular (E55).

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the writing of this scope note (E7) used specific object Nicholas Crofts’ computer (E22) mode of use Typing Tool; Storage Medium (E55)
• the people of Iraq calling the place identified by TGN ‘7017998’ (E7) used specific object “Quyunjig” (E44) mode of use Current; Vernacular (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property describes the use of material or immaterial things in a way essential to the performance or the outcome of an E7 Activity.

This property typically applies to tools, instruments, moulds, raw materials and items embedded in a product. It implies that the presence of the object in question was a necessary condition for the action. For example, the activity of writing this text required the use of a computer. An immaterial thing can be used if at least one of its carriers is present. For example, the software tools on a computer.

Another example is the use of a particular name by a particular group of people over some span to identify a thing, such as a settlement. In this case, the physical carriers of this name are at least the people understanding its use.

• the writing of this scope note (E7) used specific object Nicholas Crofts’ computer (E22) mode of use Typing Tool; Storage Medium (E55)
• the people of Iraq calling the place identified by TGN ‘7017998’ (E7) used specific object ‘Quyunjig’ (E44) mode of use Current; Vernacular (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the writing of this scope note (E7) used specific object Nicholas Crofts’ computer (E22) mode of use Typing Tool; Storage Medium (E55)
• the people of Iraq calling the place identified by TGN ‘7017998’ (E7) used specific object “Quyunjig” (E44) mode of use Current; Vernacular (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the writing of the scope note of the CIDOC CRM property P16 used specific object contained in the CIDOC CRM version 4.1 (E7) used specific object Nicholas Crofts’ computer (E22) mode of useTyping Tool; Storage Medium (E55) [the original scope note was extended in the CIDOC CRM version 4.3]
• the people of Iraq calling the place identified by TGN ‘7017998’ (E7) used specific object“Quyunjig” (E41) mode of use Current; Vernacular (E55)

Quantification: one to one (1,1:1,1)
Scope note:

This property describes the temporal projection of an instance of an E92 Spacetime Volume. The property P4 has time-span is a shortcut of the more fully developed path from E4 Period through P158 occupied, E92 Spacetime Volume P160 has temporal projection to E52 Time Span. 

Quantification: many to one,necessary (1,1,0,n)
Scope note:

This property describes the temporal projection of an instance of E92 Spacetime Volume. The property P4 has time-span is the same as P160 has temporal projection if it is used to document an instance of E4 Period or any subclass of it.

• The spatio-temporal trajectory of the H.M.S. Temeraire from its building in 1798 to its destruction in 1838 (E92) has temporal projection The Time-Span of the existence of H.M.S. Temeraire (E52) [at some time within (P82) “1798-1838” (E61).] (Willis, 2010)
• The Battle of Waterloo 1815 (E7) has temporal projection the time-span of The Battle of Waterloo (E52) [at some time within (P82) “Sunday, 18^th June 1815” (E61).] (Black, 2010)

Quantification: one to one (1,1:1,1)
Scope note:

This property describes the temporal projection of an instance of an E92 Spacetime Volume. The property P4 has time-span is a shortcut of the more fully developed path from E4 Period through P158 occupied, E92 Spacetime Volume P160 has temporal projection to E52 Time Span. 

Quantification: many to one, necessary (1,1:0,n)
Scope note:

This property describes the temporal projection of an instance of an E92 Spacetime Volume. The property P4 has time-span is the same as P160 has temporal projection if it is used to document an instance of E4 Period or any subclass of it. 

• the spatio-temporal trajectory of the H.M.S. Temeraire from its building in 1798 to its destruction in 1838 (E5) has temporal projection The Time-Span of the existence of H.M.S. Temeraire [at some time within (P82)1798-1838 (E61)] (Willis, 2010)
• The Battle of Waterloo 1815 (E7) has temporal projectionthe time-span of The Battle of Waterloo [at some time within (P82)Sunday, 18 June 1815 (E61)] (Black, 2010)

Quantification: one to one (1,1:1,1)
Scope note:

This property describes the temporal projection of an instance of an E92 Spacetime Volume. The property P4 has time-span is a shortcut of the more fully developed path from E4 Period through P158 occupied, E92 Spacetime Volume P160 has temporal projection to E52 Time Span. 

Quantification: one to one (1,1:1,1)
Scope note:

This property describes the temporal projection of an instance of an E92 Spacetime Volume. The property P4 has time-span is the same as P160 has temporal projection if it is used to document an instance of E4 Period or any subclass of it. 

Quantification: one to one (1,1:1,1)
Scope note:

This property describes the temporal projection of an instance of an E92 Spacetime Volume. The property P4 has time-span is the same as P160 has temporal projection if it is used to document an instance of E4 Period or any subclass of it. 

Quantification: one to one (1,1:1,1)
Scope note:

This property describes the temporal projection of an instance of an E92 Spacetime Volume. The property P4 has time-span is the same as P160 has temporal projection if it is used to document an instance of E4 Period or any subclass of it. 

Quantification: one to many,necessary,dependent (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of an instance of E92 Spacetime Volume with an instance of E53 Place that is the result of the spatial projection of the instance of the E92 Spacetime Volume on a reference space.

In general, there can be more than one useful reference space (for reference space see P156 occupies and P157 is at rest relative to) to describe the spatial projection of a spacetime volume, for example, in describing a sea battle, the difference between the battle ship and the seafloor as reference spaces. Thus, it can be seen that the projection is not unique.

The spatial projection is the actual spatial coverage of a spacetime volume, which normally has fuzzy boundaries except for instances of E92 Spacetime Volumes which are geometrically defined in the same reference system as the range of this property are an exception to this and do not have fuzzy boundaries. Modelling explicitly fuzzy spatial projections serves therefore as a common topological reference of different spatial approximations rather than absolute geometric determination, for instance for relating outer or inner spatial boundaries for the respective spacetime volumes.

In case the domain of an instance of P161 has spatial projection is an instance of E4 Period, the spatial projection describes all areas that period was ever present at, for instance, the Roman Empire.

This property is part of the fully developed path from E18 Physical Thing through P196 defines, E92 Spacetime Volume, P161 has spatial projection to E53 Place, which in turn is implied by P156 occupies (is occupied by).

This property is part of the fully developed path from E4 Period through P161 has spatial projection, E53 Place, P89 falls within (contains) to E53 Place, which in turn is shortcut by P7 took place at (witnessed).

• The Roman Empire (E4) has spatial projection all areas ever claimed by Rome (E53). (Clare & Edwards, 1992)

Quantification: one to many, necessary, dependent (1,n:1,1)
Scope note:

Quantification: one to many, necessary, dependent (1,n:1,1)
Scope note:

Quantification: one to many, necessary, dependent (1,n:1,1)
Scope note:

• The Roman Empire P161 has spatial projection all areas ever claimed by Rome. (Clare, 1992)

Quantification: one to many, necessary, dependent (1,n:1,1)
Scope note:

Quantification: one to many, necessary, dependent (1,n:1,1)
Scope note:

• The Roman Empire P161 has spatial projection all areas ever claimed by Rome.

Quantification: one to many, necessary, dependent (1,n:1,1)
Scope note:

Quantification: one to many, necessary, dependent (1,n:1,1)
Scope note:

Quantification: two to many,necessary (2,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property relates an E93 Spacetime Snapshot with an arbitrary E92Spacetime Volume that restricts the extent of the former to a volume equal to or within the latter. 

Quantification: two to many,necessary (2,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property relates an E93 Spacetime Snapshot with an arbitrary instance of E53 Place that restricts the extent of the former to a volume within the back-projection of the instance of E53 Place to all times. If the instance of E53 Place is defined in two dimensions only, such as the footprint of a building, the place needs also to be back-projected into the third dimension.

Scope note:

This property relates an instance of E93 Presence with the chosen instance of E52 Time-Span that defines the time-slice of the spacetime volume that this instance of E93 Presence is related to by the property P166 was a presence of (had presence). 

• 2016-02-09 (E52  was time-span of  the last day of the 2016 Carnival in Cologne (E93).

Scope note:

This property relates an E93 Presence with an arbitrary E52 Time-Span that defines the section of the spacetime volume that this instance of E93 Presence is related to by P166 was a presence of (had presence).  that is concerned by this instance of E93 Presence. 

Scope note:

This property relates an instance of E93 Presence with an arbitrary instance of E52 Time-Span that defines the section of the spacetime volume that this instance of E93 Presence is related to by the property P166 was a presence of (had presence). 

Quantification: two to many,necessary (2,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property relates an E93 Spacetime Snapshot with an arbitrary E52 Time-Span that restricts the extent of the former to a volume within these time limits.

Quantification: two to many,necessary (2,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property relates an E93 Spacetime Snapshot with an arbitrary E52 Time-Span that restricts the extent of the former to a volume within these time limits.

Quantification: two to many,necessary (2,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property relates an E93 Spacetime Snapshot with an arbitrary E52 Time-Span that restricts the extent of the former to a volume within these time limits.

Quantification: many to one,necessary(1,1,0,n)
Scope note:

This property relates an instance of E93 Presence with the instance of E52 Time-Span that defines the time-slice of the spacetime volume that this instance of E93 Presence is related to via the property P166 was a presence of (had presence).

There are two typical cases for the determination of the related instance of E52 Time-Span. In the first, it is the temporal extent of an instance of E2 Temporal Entity (documented with P4 has time-span (is time-span of)): this then documents the simultaneity of the instance of E93 Presence and the instance of E2 Temporal Entity, even if the absolute time-span is not known, and can be regarded as a phenomenal timespan. In the second, the instance of E52 Time-Span is a date range declared in or derived from historical sources or provided by dating methods: this is a declarative timespan.

• 2016-02-09 (E52) temporally specifies the last day of the 2016 Carnival in Cologne (E93).
• Johann Joachim Winckelmann’s whereabouts in December 1755 (E93) is temporally specified by December 1755 (E52.) (Leppmann, 1970)
• Johann Joachim Winkelmann’s whereabouts from 19^th November 1755 until 9^th April 1768 (E93) is temporally specified by November 19^th 1755 until 9^th April 1768 (E52). (Leppmann, 1970)

Quantification: many to one, necessary (1,1:0,n)
Scope note:

This property relates an instance of E93 Presence with the instance of E52 Time-Span that defines the time-slice of the spacetime volume that this instance of E93 Presence is related to via the property P166 was a presence of (had presence).

There are two typical cases for the determination of the related instance of E52 Time-Span. In the first, it is the temporal extent of an instance of E2 Temporal Entity (documented with P4 has time-span (is time-span of)): this then documents the simultaneity of the instance of E93 Presence and the instance of E2 Temporal Entity, even if the absolute time-span is not known, and can be regarded as a phenomenal timespan. In the second, the instance of E52 Time-Span is a date range declared in or derived from historical sources or provided by dating methods: this is a declarative timespan.

• 2016-02-09 (E52) temporally specifiesthe last day of the 2016 Carnival in Cologne (E93).

• Johann Joachim Winckelmann’s whereabouts in December 1755 (E93) is temporally specified byDecember 1755 (E52) (Leppmann, 1970)

• Johann Joachim Winkelmann’s whereabouts from November 19 1755 until April 9 1768 (E93) is temporally specified byNovember 19 1755 until April 9 1768 (E52) (Leppmann, 1970)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E73 Information Object with an instance of E90 Symbolic Object (or any of its subclasses) that was included in it.

This property makes it possible to recognise the autonomous status of the incorporated signs, which were created in a distinct context, and can be incorporated in many instances of E73 Information Object, and to highlight the difference between structural and accidental whole-part relationships between conceptual entities.

It accounts for many cultural facts that are quite frequent and significant: the inclusion of a poem in an anthology, the re-use of an operatic aria in a new opera, the use of a reproduction of a painting for a book cover or a CD booklet, the integration of textual quotations, the presence of lyrics in a song that sets those lyrics to music, the presence of the text of a play in a movie based on that play, etc.

In particular, this property allows for modelling relationships of different levels of symbolic specificity, such as the natural language words making up a particular text, the characters making up the words and punctuation, the choice of fonts and page layout for the characters.

When restricted to information objects, that is, seen as a property with E73 Information Object as domain and range the property is transitive.

A digital photograph of a manuscript page incorporates the text of a manuscript page, if the respective text is defined as a sequence of symbols of a particular type, such as Latin characters, and the resolution and quality of the digital image is sufficient to resolve these symbols so they are readable on the digital image.

• The content of Charles-Moïse Briquet’s ‘Les Filigranes: dictionnaire historique des marques du papier’ (E32) incorporates the visual aspect of the watermark used around 1358-61 by some Spanish papermaker(s) and identified as ‘Briquet 4019’ (E37). (Briquet, 1985)
• The visual content of Jacopo Amigoni’s painting known as ‘The Singer Farinelli and friends’ (E36) incorporates the musical notation of Farinelli’s musical work entitled ‘La Partenza’ (E73). (National Gallery of Victoria)
• The visual content of Nicolas Poussin’s painting entitled ‘Les Bergers d’Arcadie’ (E36) incorporates the Latin phrase ‘Et in Arcadia ego’ (E33). (Wikipedia, 2020)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E73 Information Object with an instance of E90 Symbolic Object (or any of its subclasses) that was included in it.
This property makes it possible to recognise the autonomous status of the incorporated signs, which were created in a distinct context, and can be incorporated in many distinct self-contained expressions, and to highlight the difference between structural and accidental whole-part relationships between conceptual entities.
It accounts for many cultural facts that are quite frequent and significant: the inclusion of a poem in an anthology, the re-use of an operatic aria in a new opera, the use of a reproduction of a painting for a book cover or a CD booklet, the integration of textual quotations, the presence of lyrics in a song that sets those lyrics to music, the presence of the text of a play in a movie based on that play, etc.
In particular, this property allows for modelling relationships of different levels of symbolic specificity, such as the natural language words making up a particular text, the characters making up the words and punctuation, the choice of fonts and page layout for the characters.
A digital photograph of a manuscript page incorporates the text of the manuscript page

• The content of Charles-Moïse Briquet’s ‘Les Filigranes: dictionnaire historique des marques du papier’ (E32) P165 incorporates the visual aspect of the watermark used around 1358-61 by some Spanish papermaker(s) and identified as ‘Briquet 4019’ (E37)
• The visual content of Jacopo Amigoni’s painting known as ‘The Singer Farinelli and friends’ (E38) P165 incorporates the musical notation of Farinelli’s musical work entitled ‘La Partenza’ (E73)
• The visual content of Nicolas Poussin’s painting entitled ‘Les Bergers d’Arcadie’ (E38) P165 incorporates the Latin phrase ‘Et in Arcadia ego’ (E33)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E73 Information Object with an instance of E90 Symbolic Object (or any of its subclasses) that was included in it.

This property makes it possible to recognise the autonomous status of the incorporated signs, which were created in a distinct context, and can be incorporated in many distinct self-contained expressions, and to highlight the difference between structural and accidental whole-part relationships between conceptual entities.

It accounts for many cultural facts that are quite frequent and significant: the inclusion of a poem in an anthology, the re-use of an operatic aria in a new opera, the use of a reproduction of a painting for a book cover or a CD booklet, the integration of textual quotations, the presence of lyrics in a song that sets those lyrics to music, the presence of the text of a play in a movie based on that play, etc.

In particular, this property allows for modelling relationships of different levels of symbolic specificity, such as the natural language words making up a particular text, the characters making up the words and punctuation, the choice of fonts and page layout for the characters.

When restricted to information objects, that is, seen as a property with E73 Information Object as domain and range the property is transitive.

A digital photograph of a manuscript page incorporates the text of a manuscript page, if the respective text is defined as a sequence of symbols of a particular type, such as Latin characters, and the resolution and quality of the digital image is sufficient to resolve these symbols so they are readable on the digital image.

• The content of Charles-Moïse Briquet’s ‘Les Filigranes: dictionnaire historique des marques du papier’ (E32) P165 incorporates the visual aspect of the watermark used around 1358-61 by some Spanish papermaker(s) and identified as ‘Briquet 4019’ (E37) (Briquet, 195)
• The visual content of Jacopo Amigoni’s painting known as ‘The Singer Farinelli and friends’ (E36) P165 incorporates the musical notation of Farinelli’s musical work entitled ‘La Partenza’ (E73)  (National Gallery of Victoria)
• The visual content of Nicolas Poussin’s painting entitled ‘Les Bergers d’Arcadie’ (E38) P165 incorporates the Latin phrase ‘Et in Arcadia ego’ (E36)  (Wikipedia, 2020)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E73 Information Object with an instance of E90 Symbolic Object (or any of its subclasses) that was included in it.
This property makes it possible to recognise the autonomous status of the incorporated signs, which were created in a distinct context, and can be incorporated in many distinct self-contained expressions, and to highlight the difference between structural and accidental whole-part relationships between conceptual entities.
It accounts for many cultural facts that are quite frequent and significant: the inclusion of a poem in an anthology, the re-use of an operatic aria in a new opera, the use of a reproduction of a painting for a book cover or a CD booklet, the integration of textual quotations, the presence of lyrics in a song that sets those lyrics to music, the presence of the text of a play in a movie based on that play, etc.
In particular, this property allows for modelling relationships of different levels of symbolic specificity, such as the natural language words making up a particular text, the characters making up the words and punctuation, the choice of fonts and page layout for the characters.
When restricted to information objects, that is, seen as a property with E73 Information Object as domain and range the property is transitive.
A digital photograph of a manuscript page incorporates the text of a manuscript page, if the respective text is defined as a sequence of symbols of a particular type, such as Latin characters, and the resolution and quality of the digital image is sufficient to resolve these symbols so they are readable on the digital image.

• The content of Charles-Moïse Briquet’s ‘Les Filigranes: dictionnaire historique des marques du papier’ (E32) P165 incorporates the visual aspect of the watermark used around 1358-61 by some Spanish papermaker(s) and identified as ‘Briquet 4019’ (E37)
• The visual content of Jacopo Amigoni’s painting known as ‘The Singer Farinelli and friends’ (E38) P165 incorporates the musical notation of Farinelli’s musical work entitled ‘La Partenza’ (E73)
• The visual content of Nicolas Poussin’s painting entitled ‘Les Bergers d’Arcadie’ (E38) P165 incorporates the Latin phrase ‘Et in Arcadia ego’ (E33)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of F22 Self-Contained Expression with an instance of E90 Symbolic Object (or any of its subclasses) that was included in it.

This property makes it possible to recognise the autonomous status of the incorporated signs, which were created in a distinct context, and can be incorporated in many distinct self-contained expressions, and to highlight the difference between structural and accidental whole-part relationships between conceptual entities.

It accounts for many cultural facts that are quite frequent and significant: the inclusion of a poem in an anthology, the re-use of an operatic aria in a new opera, the use of a reproduction of a painting for a book cover or a CD booklet, the integration of textual quotations, the presence of lyrics in a song that sets those lyrics to music, the presence of the text of a play in a movie based on that play, etc.

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E73 Information Object with an instance of E90 Symbolic Object (or any of its subclasses) that was included in it.
This property makes it possible to recognise the autonomous status of the incorporated signs, which were created in a distinct context, and can be incorporated in many distinct self-contained expressions, and to highlight the difference between structural and accidental whole-part relationships between conceptual entities.
It accounts for many cultural facts that are quite frequent and significant: the inclusion of a poem in an anthology, the re-use of an operatic aria in a new opera, the use of a reproduction of a painting for a book cover or a CD booklet, the integration of textual quotations, the presence of lyrics in a song that sets those lyrics to music, the presence of the text of a play in a movie based on that play, etc.
In particular, this property allows for modelling relationships of different levels of symbolic specificity, such as the natural language words making up a particular text, the characters making up the words and punctuation, the choice of fonts and page layout for the characters.
A digital photograph of a manuscript page incorporates the text of the manuscript page

• The content of Charles-Moïse Briquet’s ‘Les Filigranes: dictionnaire historique des marques du papier’ (E32) P165 incorporates the visual aspect of the watermark used around 1358-61 by some Spanish papermaker(s) and identified as ‘Briquet 4019’ (E37)
• The visual content of Jacopo Amigoni’s painting known as ‘The Singer Farinelli and friends’ (E38) P165 incorporates the musical notation of Farinelli’s musical work entitled ‘La Partenza’ (E73)
• The visual content of Nicolas Poussin’s painting entitled ‘Les Bergers d’Arcadie’ (E38) P165 incorporates the Latin phrase ‘Et in Arcadia ego’ (E33)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E73 Information Object with an instance of E90 Symbolic Object (or any of its subclasses) that was included in it.
This property makes it possible to recognise the autonomous status of the incorporated signs, which were created in a distinct context, and can be incorporated in many distinct self-contained expressions, and to highlight the difference between structural and accidental whole-part relationships between conceptual entities.
It accounts for many cultural facts that are quite frequent and significant: the inclusion of a poem in an anthology, the re-use of an operatic aria in a new opera, the use of a reproduction of a painting for a book cover or a CD booklet, the integration of textual quotations, the presence of lyrics in a song that sets those lyrics to music, the presence of the text of a play in a movie based on that play, etc.
In particular, this property allows for modelling relationships of different levels of symbolic specificity, such as the natural language words making up a particular text, the characters making up the words and punctuation, the choice of fonts and page layout for the characters.
A digital photograph of a manuscript page incorporates the text of the manuscript page.
This property in an implicit transitive property

• The content of Charles-Moïse Briquet’s ‘Les Filigranes: dictionnaire historique des marques du papier’ (E32) P165 incorporates the visual aspect of the watermark used around 1358-61 by some Spanish papermaker(s) and identified as ‘Briquet 4019’ (E37)
• The visual content of Jacopo Amigoni’s painting known as ‘The Singer Farinelli and friends’ (E38) P165 incorporates the musical notation of Farinelli’s musical work entitled ‘La Partenza’ (E73)
• The visual content of Nicolas Poussin’s painting entitled ‘Les Bergers d’Arcadie’ (E38) P165 incorporates the Latin phrase ‘Et in Arcadia ego’ (E33)

Quantification: many to one,necessary (1,1,0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E93 Presence with the instance of E92 Spacetime Volume of which it represents a temporal restriction (i.e.: a time-slice). Instantiating this property constitutes a necessary part of the identity of the respective instance of E93 Presence.

• The Roman Empire on 19 August AD 14 (E93) was a presence of The Roman Empire (E4). (Clare and Edwards, 1992)

Quantification: many to one, necessary (1,1:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E93 Presence with the instance of E92 Spacetime Volume of which it represents a temporal restriction (i.e.: a time-slice). Instantiating this property constitutes a necessary part of the identity of the respective instance of E93 Presence.   

• The Roman Empire on 19 August AD 14 (E93) was a presence ofThe Roman Empire (E4) (Clare, 1992)

Quantification: many to one, necessary (1,1:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E93 Presence with the instance of E92 Spacetime Volume of which it represents a temporal restriction (i.e.: a time-slice). Instantiating this property constitutes a necessary part of the identity of the respective instance of E93 Presence.   

Scope note:

This property relates an E93 Presence with the STV it is part of… 

Quantification: many to one, necessary (1,1:0,n)
Scope note:

This property relates an E93 Presence with the STV it is part of… 

Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E93 Presence with an instance of E53 Place that geometrically includes the spatial projection of the respective instance of E93 Presence. Besides others, this property may be used to state in which space an object has been for some known time, such as a room of a castle or in a drawer. It may also be used to describe a confinement of the spatial extent of some realm during a known time-span. It is a shortcut of the more fully developed path from E93 Presence through P161 has spatial projection, E53 Place, P89 falls within (contains) to E53 Place.    

Scope note:

This property points to a wider area in which my thing /event was…

Scope note:

This property points to a wider area in which my thing /event was…

Quantification: many to many,necessary (1,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E93 Presence with an instance of E53 Place that geometrically includes the spatial projection of the respective instance of E93 Presence. Besides others, this property may be used to state in which space an object has been for some known time, such as a room of a castle or in a drawer. It may also be used to describe a confinement of the spatial extent of some realm during a known time-span.

This property is a shortcut of the more fully developed path from E93 Presence through P161 has spatial projection, E53 Place, P89 falls within (contains) to E53 Place.

• Johann Joachim Winkelmann’s whereabouts in December 1755 (E93) was within Rome (E53). (Leppmann, 1970)
• Johann Joachim Winkelmann’s whereabouts from 19^th November 19 1755 until 9^th April 1768 (E93) was within Italy (E53). (Leppmann, 1970)

Quantification: many to many, necessary (1,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E93 Presence with an instance of E53 Place that geometrically includes the spatial projection of the respective instance of E93 Presence. Besides others, this property may be used to state in which space an object has been for some known time, such as a room of a castle or in a drawer. It may also be used to describe a confinement of the spatial extent of some realm during a known time-span.

This property is a shortcut of the more fully developed path from E93 Presence through P161 has spatial projection, E53 Place, P89 falls within (contains) to E53 Place.    

• Johann Joachim Winkelmann’s whereabouts in December 1755 (E93) was withinRome (E53) (Leppmann, 1970)
• Johann Joachim Winkelmann’s whereabouts from November 19 1755 until April 9 1768 (E93) was withinItaly (E53) (Leppmann, 1970)

Quantification: one to many, dependent (0,n:1,1)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E53 Place with an instance of E94 Space Primitive that defines it. Syntactic variants or use of different scripts may result in multiple instances of E94 Space Primitive defining exactly the same place. Transformations between different reference systems always result in new definitions of places approximating each other and not in alternative definitions.

• The centroid from https://sws.geonames.org/735927 (E53) place is defined by 40°31'17.9"N 21°15'48.3"E (E94). [A single point for approximating the centre of the city of Kastoria, Greece]
• Martin’s coordinates for Kastoria (E53) place is defined by 40°30'23"N 21°14'53"E, 40°31'40"N 21°16'43"E (E94). [A square covering the built settlement structure of Kastoria, Greece]
• Martin’s centroid for Kastoria (E53) place is defined by 40°31'01.5"N 21°15'48"E (E94). [A point in the lake of Kastoria in the centre of the area covered by the city]
• The position measured by Alexander von Humboldt for the Plaza Mayor in Cumaná, Sucre, Venezuela 1799-1800AD (E53) place is defined by 10°27'52"N 66°30'02"W (E94). [West of the Observatory of Paris = 64°09'51"W of Greenwich, actually 1,1km east of today’s Plaza Andrés Eloy Blanco of Cumaná] (Humboldt, 1859)

Quantification: one to many, dependent (0,n:1,1)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E53 Place with an instance of E94 Space Primitive that defines it. Syntactic variants or use of different scripts may result in multiple instances of E94 Space Primitive defining exactly the same place. Transformations between different reference systems always result in new definitions of places approximating each other and not in alternative definitions.

• the centroid from https://sws.geonames.org/735927 (E53) place is defined by40°31'17.9"N 21°15'48.3"E (E94) [a single point for approximating the centre of the city of Kastoria, Greece]
• Martin’s coordinates for Kastoria (E53) place is defined by40°30'23"N 21°14'53"E, 40°31'40"N 21°16'43"E (E94) [a square covering the built settlement structure of Kastoria, Greece]
• Martin’s centroid for Kastoria (E53) placeis defined by40°31'01.5"N 21°15'48"E (E94) [a point in the lake of Kastoria in the centre of the area covered by the city]
• the position measured by Alexander von Humboldt for the Plaza Mayor in Cumaná, Sucre, Venezuela 1799-1800AD (E53) place is defined by10°27'52"N 66°30'02"W (E94) [west of the Observatory of Paris = 64°09'51"W of Greenwich, actually 1,1km east of today’s Plaza Andrés Eloy Blanco of Cumaná] (from: Alexander von Humboldt, Reise in die Aequinoctial-Gegenden des neuen Continents.(Translated by Hermann Hauff). The only translation authorized by Alexander von Humboldt; editor: J.G. Cotta, Stuttgart 1859–60)

Quantification: one to many, dependent (0,n:1,1)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E53 Place with an instance of E94 Space Primitive that defines it. Syntactic variants or use of different scripts may result in multiple instances of E94 Space Primitive defining exactly the same place. Transformations between different reference systems always result in new definitions of places approximating each other and not in alternative definitions. 

Quantification: one to many, dependent (0,n:1,1)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E53 Place with an instance of E94 Space Primitive that defines it. Syntactic variants or use of different scripts may result in multiple instances of E94 Space Primitive defining exactly the same place. Transformations between different reference systems in general result in new definitions of places approximating each other and not in alternative definitions. Note that it is possible for a place to be defined by phenomena causal to it or other forms of identification rather than by an instance of E94 Space Primitive. In this case, this property must not be used for approximating the respective instance of E53 Place with an instance of E94 Space Primitive.

Quantification: one to many, dependent (0,n:1,1)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E53 Place with an instance of E94 Space Primitive that defines it. Syntactic variants or use of different scripts may result in multiple instances of E94 Space Primitive defining exactly the same place. Transformations between different reference systems in general result in new definitions of places approximating each other and not in alternative definitions. Note that it is possible for a place to be defined by phenomena causal to it or other forms of identification rather than by an instance of E94 Space Primitive. In this case, this property must not be used for approximating the respective instance of E53 Place with an instance of E94 Space Primitive.

Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E95 Spacetime Primitive with the instance of E92 Spacetime Volume it defines. 

Subproperty of: E41Appellation. P1i identifies: E1CRM Entity

• {40°30'23"N 21°14'53"E, 40°31'40"N 21°16'43"E, 200BC-2020AD} (E95) defines spacetime volumeMartin’s spatiotemporal enclosure 2020 for the evolution of the settlement of today’s city of Kastoria, Greece, since its conquest by the Romans (E92) [a square covering the current built settlement structure of Kastoria, Greece, through the years 200BC to 2020AD, which includes the extents of earlier phases of the city]

Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E95 Spacetime Primitive with the instance of E92 Spacetime Volume it defines. 

Quantification: many to one,necessary (1,1,0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E95 Spacetime Primitive with the instance of E92 Spacetime Volume it defines.

• {40°30'23N 21°14'53E, 40°31'40N 21°16'43E, 200BC-2020AD} (E95) defines spacetime volume Martin’s spatiotemporal enclosure 2020 for the evolution of the settlement of today’s city of Kastoria, Greece, since its conquest by the Romans (E92). [A square covering the current built settlement structure of Kastoria, Greece, through the years 200BC to 2020AD, which includes the extents of earlier phases of the city]

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the resignation of the chief executive (E7) was motivated by the collapse of SwissAir (E68).
• the coronation of Elizabeth II (E7) was motivated by the death of George VI (E69)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property describes an item or items that are regarded as a reason for carrying out the E7 Activity.

For example, the discovery of a large hoard of treasure may call for a celebration, an order from head quarters can start a military manoeuvre.

• the resignation of the chief executive (E7) was motivated by the collapse of SwissAir (E68).
• the coronation of Elizabeth II (E7) was motivated by the death of George VI (E69)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the resignation of the chief executive (E7) was motivated by the collapse of SwissAir (E68).
• the coronation of Elizabeth II (E7) was motivated by the death of George VI (E69)