Concept Search

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property defines the kind of objects used in an E7 Activity, when the specific instance is either unknown or not of interest, such as use of "a hammer".

• at the Battle of Agincourt (E7), the English archers used object of type long bow (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

This property defines the kind of objects used in an E7 Activity, when the specific instance is either unknown or not of interest, such as use of "a hammer".

• at the Battle of Agincourt (E7), the English archers used object of type long bow (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies the instance of E57 Material employed in an instance of E11 Modification.

The instance of E57 Material used during the instance of E11 Modification does not necessarily become incorporated into the instance of E24 Physical Human-Made Thing that forms the subject of the instance of E11 Modification.

• The repairing of the Queen Mary (E11) employed Steel (E57). [Beginning October 1942] (Britton, 2012)
• Distilled water (E57) was employed in the restoration of the Sistine Chapel (E11). (Pietrangeli, C., 1986)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies E57 Material employed in an E11 Modification.

The E57 Material used during the E11 Modification does not necessarily become incorporated into the E24 Physical Man-Made Thing that forms the subject of the E11 Modification.

• the repairing of the Queen Mary (E11) employed Steel (E57)
• distilled water (E57) was employed in the restoration of the Sistine Chapel (E11)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the repairing of the Queen Mary (E11) employed Steel (E57)
•  distilled water (E57) was employed in the restoration of the Sistine Chapel (E11)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the repairing of the Queen Mary (E11) employedSteel (E57) (Britton, 2012) [Beginning October 1942]
• distilled water (E57) was employed inthe restoration of the Sistine Chapel (E11) (Pietrangeli, C., 1986)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the repairing of the Queen Mary (E11) employed Steel (E57)
•  distilled water (E57) was employed in the restoration of the Sistine Chapel (E11)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the repairing of the Queen Mary (E11) employed Steel (E57)
•  distilled water (E57) was employed in the restoration of the Sistine Chapel (E11)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies E57 Material employed in an E11 Modification.

The E57 Material used during the E11 Modification does not necessarily become incorporated into the E24 Physical Man-Made Thing that forms the subject of the E11 Modification.

• the repairing of the Queen Mary (E11) employed Steel (E57)
• distilled water (E57) was employed in the restoration of the Sistine Chapel (E11)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the repairing of the Queen Mary (E11) employed Steel (E57)
•  distilled water (E57) was employed in the restoration of the Sistine Chapel (E11)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies E57 Material employed in an E11 Modification Event.

The E57 Material used during the E11 Modification Event does not necessarily become incorporated into the E24 Physical Man-Made Stuff that forms the subject of the E11 Modification Event.

• the repairing of the Queen Mary (E11) employed Steel (E57)
• distilled water (E57) was employed in the restoration of the Sistine Chapel (E11)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the repairing of the Queen Mary (E11) employed Steel (E57)
•  distilled water (E57) was employed in the restoration of the Sistine Chapel (E11)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the repairing of the Queen Mary (E11) employed Steel (E57)
•  distilled water (E57) was employed in the restoration of the Sistine Chapel (E11)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates an instance of E55 Type with another instance of E55 Type that has a broader meaning.

It allows instances of E55 Types to be organised into hierarchies. This is the sense of broader term generic (BTG) as defined in ISO 25964-2:2013 (International Organization for Standardization 2013).

This property is transitive.

• dime (E55) has broader term coin (E55). (Yerkes, 1989)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies a super-Type to which an E55 Type is related.

It allows Types to be organised into hierarchies. This is the sense of broader term generic (BTG) as defined in ISO 2788

• dime (E55) has broader term coin (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• dime (E55) has broader term coin (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• dime (E55) has broader term coin (E55) (Yerkes, 1989)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• dime (E55) has broader term coin (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• dime (E55) has broader term coin (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies a super-Type to which an E55 Type is related.

It allows Types to be organised into hierarchies. This is the sense of broader term generic (BTG) as defined in ISO 2788

• dime (E55) has broader term coin (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• dime (E55) has broader term coin (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies a super-Type to which an E55 Type is related.

It allows Types to be organised into hierarchies. This is the sense of broader term generic (BTG) as defined in ISO 2788

• dime (E55) has broader term coin (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• dime (E55) has broader term coin (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• dime (E55) has broader term coin (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies an instance E90 Symbolic Object carried by an instance of E18 Physical Thing. Since an instance of E90 Symbolic Object is defined as an immaterial idealization over potentially multiple carriers, any individual realization on a particular physical carrier may be defective, due to deterioration or shortcomings in the process of creating the realization compared to the intended ideal. As long as such defects do not substantially affect the complete recognition of the respective symbolic object, it is still regarded as carrying an instance of this E90 Symbolic Object. If these defects are of scholarly interest, the particular realization can be modelled as an instance of E25 Human-Made Feature. Note, that any instance of E90 Symbolic Object incorporated (P165) in the carried symbolic object is also carried by the same instance of E18 Physical Thing.

• Matthew’s paperback copy of Reach for the Sky (E18) carries the text of Reach for the Sky (E73). [see also: (Brickhill, 2001)] (fictitious)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Matthew’s paperback copy of Reach for the Sky (E84) carries the text of Reach for the Sky (E73)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies an E73 Information Object carried by an instance of E24 Physical Man-Made Thing.

In general this would be an E84 Information Carrier P65 shows visual item (is shown by) is a specialisation of P128 carries (is carried by) which should be used for carrying visual items.

• Matthew’s paperback copy of Reach for the Sky (E84) carries the text of Reach for the Sky (E73)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Matthew’s paperback copy of Reach for the Sky (E84) carries the text of Reach for the Sky (E73)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Matthew’s paperback copy of Reach for the Sky (E18) carries the text of Reach for the Sky (E73) (Brickhill, 2001) (fictitious)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Matthew’s paperback copy of Reach for the Sky (E84) carries the text of Reach for the Sky (E73)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Matthew’s paperback copy of Reach for the Sky (E84) carries the text of Reach for the Sky (E73)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies an E73 Information Object carried by an instance of E24 Physical Man-Made Thing.

In general this would be an E84 Information Carrier P65 shows visual item (is shown by) is a specialisation of P128 carries (is carried by) which should be used for carrying visual items.

• Matthew’s paperback copy of Reach for the Sky (E84) carries the text of Reach for the Sky (E73)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Matthew’s paperback copy of Reach for the Sky (E84) carries the text of Reach for the Sky (E73)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies an E73 Information Object carried by an instance of E24 Physical Man-Made Stuff.

In general this would be an E84 Information Carrier P65 shows visual item (is shown by) is a specialisation of P128 carries (is carried by) which should be used for carrying visual items.

• Matthew’s paperback copy of Reach for the Sky (E84) carries the text of Reach for the Sky (E73)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Matthew’s paperback copy of Reach for the Sky (E84) carries the text of Reach for the Sky (E73)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property documents that an instance of E89 Propositional Object has as subject an instance of E1 CRM Entity.

This differs from P67 refers to (is referred to by), which refers to an instance of E1 CRM Entity, in that it describes the primary subject or subjects of an instance of E89 Propositional Object.

• The text entitled ‘Reach for the sky’ (E33) is about Douglas Bader (E21). (Brickhill, 2001)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property documents that an E89 Propositional Object has as subject an instance of E1 CRM Entity.

This differs from P67 refers to (is referred to by), which refers to an E1 CRM Entity, in that it describes the primary subject or subjects of an E89 Propositional Object.

• The text entitled ‘Reach for the sky’ (E33) is about Douglas Bader (E21)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  The text entitled ‘Reach for the sky’ (E33)  is about Douglas Bader (E21)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  The text entitled ‘Reach for the sky’ (E33)  is about Douglas Bader (E21) (Brickhill, 2001)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  The text entitled ‘Reach for the sky’ (E33)  is about Douglas Bader (E21)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  The text entitled ‘Reach for the sky’ (E33)  is about Douglas Bader (E21)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property documents that an E89 Propositional Object has as subject an instance of E1 CRM Entity.

This differs from P67 refers to (is referred to by), which refers to an E1 CRM Entity, in that it describes the primary subject or subjects of an E89 Propositional Object.

• The text entitled ‘Reach for the sky’ (E33) is about Douglas Bader (E21)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  The text entitled ‘Reach for the sky’ (E33)  is about Douglas Bader (E21)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies a E1 CRM Entity that is the subject of an E73 Information Object, in the sense of aboutness used in library science.

This differs from P67 refers to (is referred to by), which refers to an E1 CRM Entity, in that it describes the primary subject or subjects of the E73 Information Object.

• reach for the Sky (E73) is about Douglas Bader (E39)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  The text entitled ‘Reach for the sky’ (E33)  is about Douglas Bader (E21)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  The text entitled ‘Reach for the sky’ (E33)  is about Douglas Bader (E21)

Quantification: one to many, necessary (1,n:0,1)
Scope note:

• the Tay Bridge Disaster (E6) destroyed The Tay Bridge (E22)

Quantification: one to many,necessary (1,n,0,1)
Scope note:

This property allows specific instances of E18 Physical Thing that have been destroyed to be related to a destruction event.

Destruction implies the end of an item’s life as a subject of cultural documentation – the physical matter of which the item was composed may in fact continue to exist. A destruction event may be contiguous with a Production that brings into existence a derived object composed partly of matter from the destroyed object.

• the Tay Bridge Disaster (E6) destroyed The Tay Bridge (E22)

Quantification: one to many, necessary (1,n:0,1)
Scope note:

• the Tay Bridge Disaster (E6) destroyed The Tay Bridge (E22)

Quantification: one to many, necessary (1,n:0,1)
Scope note:

• the Tay Bridge Disaster (E6) destroyed The Tay Bridge (E22)

Quantification: one to many,necessary (1,n,0,1)
Scope note:

This property allows specific instances of E18 Physical Stuff that have been destroyed to be related to a destruction event.

Destruction implies the end of an item’s life as a subject of cultural documentation – the physical matter of which the item was composed may in fact continue to exist. A destruction event may be contiguous with a production event that brings into existence a derived object composed partly of matter from the destroyed object.

• the Tay Bridge Disaster (E6) destroyed The Tay Bridge (E22)

Quantification: one to many, necessary (1,n:0,1)
Scope note:

• the Tay Bridge Disaster (E6) destroyed The Tay Bridge (E22)

Quantification: one to many,necessary (1,n,0,1)
Scope note:

This property links an instance of E6 Destruction to an instance of E18 Physical Thing that has been destroyed by it.

Destruction implies the end of an item’s life as a subject of cultural documentation – the physical matter of which the item was composed may in fact continue to exist. An instance of E6 Destruction may be contiguous with an instance of E12 Production that brings into existence a derived object composed partly of matter from the destroyed object.

• The Tay Bridge Disaster (E6) destroyed The Tay Bridge (E22). (Thomas, 1972)

Quantification: one to many, necessary (1,n:0,1)
Scope note:

• the Tay Bridge Disaster (E6) destroyed The Tay Bridge (E22)

Quantification: one to many,necessary (1,n,0,1)
Scope note:

This property allows specific instances of E18 Physical Thing that have been destroyed to be related to a destruction event.

Destruction implies the end of an item’s life as a subject of cultural documentation – the physical matter of which the item was composed may in fact continue to exist. A destruction event may be contiguous with a Production that brings into existence a derived object composed partly of matter from the destroyed object.

• the Tay Bridge Disaster (E6) destroyed The Tay Bridge (E22)

Quantification: one to many, necessary (1,n:0,1)
Scope note:

• the Tay Bridge Disaster (E6) destroyed The Tay Bridge (E22)

Quantification: one to many, necessary (1,n:0,1)
Scope note:

• the Tay Bridge Disaster (E6) destroyed The Tay Bridge (E22) (Thomas, 1972)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property generalises the notions of copy of and similar to into a directed relationship, where the domain expresses the derivative or influenced item and the range the source or influencing item, if such a direction can be established. The property can also be used to express similarity in cases that can be stated between two objects only, without historical knowledge about its reasons. The property expresses a symmetric relationship in case no direction of influence can be established either from evidence on the item itself or from historical knowledge. This holds in particular for siblings of a derivation process from a common source or non-causal cultural parallels, such as some weaving patterns.

The P130.1 kind of similarity property of the P130 shows features of (features are also found on) property enables the relationship between the domain and the range to be further clarified, in the sense from domain to range, if applicable. For example, it may be expressed if both items are product “of the same mould”, or if two texts “contain identical paragraphs”.

If the reason for similarity is a sort of derivation process, i.e., that the creator has used or had in mind the form of a particular thing during the creation or production, this process should be explicitly modelled. In these cases, P130 shows features of can be regarded as a shortcut of such a process. However, the current model does not contain any path specific enough to infer this property. Specializations of the CIDOC CRM may however be more explicit, for instance describing the use of moulds etc.

This property is not transitive.

• Mary Lamb’s Cymbeline from Charles and Mary Lamb’s Tales from Shakespeare (E89) shows features of William Shakespeare’s Cymbeline (E89). (Carrington, 1954)
• The audio recording of Dante Alighieri's La divina commedia read by Enrico de Negri (E73) shows features of the text of Dante Alighieri's La divina commedia (E89). (Alighieri, 1956)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property generalises the notions of copy of and similar to into a dynamic, asymmetric relationship, where the domain expresses the derivative, if such a direction can be established.

Otherwise, the relationship is symmetric. It is a short-cut of P15 was influenced by (influenced) in a creation or production, if such a reason for the similarity can be verified. Moreover it expresses similarity in cases that can be stated between two objects only, without historical knowledge about its reasons.

• the Parthenon Frieze on the Acropolis in Athens (E22) shows features of the Original Parthenon Frieze in the British museum (E22). Kind of similarity: Copy (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the Parthenon Frieze on the Acropolis in Athens (E22) shows features of the Original Parthenon Frieze in the British museum (E22). Kind of similarity: Copy (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• Mary Lamb’s Cymbeline [from Charles and Mary Lamb’s Tales from Shakespeare] shows features ofWilliam Shakespeare’s Cymbeline (Carrington, 1954)
• The audio recording of Dante Alighieri's La divina commedia read by Enrico de Negri shows features ofthe text of Dante Alighieri's La divina commedia (Alighieri, 1956)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the Parthenon Frieze on the Acropolis in Athens (E22) shows features of the Original Parthenon Frieze in the British museum (E22). Kind of similarity: Copy (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the Parthenon Frieze on the Acropolis in Athens (E22) shows features of the Original Parthenon Frieze in the British museum (E22). Kind of similarity: Copy (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property generalises the notions of copy of and similar to into a dynamic, asymmetric relationship, where the domain expresses the derivative, if such a direction can be established.

Otherwise, the relationship is symmetric. It is a short-cut of P15 was influenced by (influenced) in a creation or production, if such a reason for the similarity can be verified. Moreover it expresses similarity in cases that can be stated between two objects only, without historical knowledge about its reasons.

• the Parthenon Frieze on the Acropolis in Athens (E22) shows features of the Original Parthenon Frieze in the British museum (E22). Kind of similarity: Copy (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the Parthenon Frieze on the Acropolis in Athens (E22) shows features of the Original Parthenon Frieze in the British museum (E22). Kind of similarity: Copy (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property generalises the notions of copy of and similar to into a dynamic, asymmetric relationship, where the domain expresses the derivative, if such a direction can be established.

Otherwise, the relationship is symmetric. It is a short-cut of P15 was influenced by (influenced) in a creation or production, if such a reason for the similarity can be verified. Moreover it expresses similarity in cases that can be stated between two objects only, without historical knowledge about its reasons.

• the Parthenon Frieze on the Acropolis in Athens (E22) shows features of the Original Parthenon Frieze in the British museum (E22). Kind of similarity: Copy (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the Parthenon Frieze on the Acropolis in Athens (E22) shows features of the Original Parthenon Frieze in the British museum (E22). Kind of similarity: Copy (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the Parthenon Frieze on the Acropolis in Athens (E22) shows features of the Original Parthenon Frieze in the British museum (E22). Kind of similarity: Copy (E55)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies a name used specifically to identify an E39 Actor.

This property is a specialisation of P1 is identified by (identifies) is identified by.

• Tyler Withersopp IV (E39) is identified by US social security number 619-17-4204 (E82)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Tyler Withersopp IV (E39) is identified by “US social security number 619-17-4204” (E82)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Tyler Withersopp IV (E39) is identified by “US social security number 619-17-4204” (E82)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Tyler Withersopp IV (E39) is identified by “US social security number 619-17-4204” (E82)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies a name used specifically to identify an E39 Actor.

This property is a specialisation of P1 is identified by (identifies) is identified by.

• Tyler Withersopp IV (E39) is identified by “US social security number 619-17-4204” (E82)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Tyler Withersopp IV (E39) is identified by “US social security number 619-17-4204” (E82)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property identifies a name used specifically to identify an E39 Actor.

This property is a specialisation of P1 is identified by (identifies) is identified by.

• Tyler Withersopp IV (E39) is identified by US social security number 619-17-4204 (E82)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Tyler Withersopp IV (E39) is identified by “US social security number 619-17-4204” (E82)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  Tyler Withersopp IV (E39) is identified by “US social security number 619-17-4204” (E82)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This symmetric property allows instances of E4 Period that overlap both temporally and spatially to be related, i,e. they share some spatio-temporal extent.

This property does not imply any ordering or sequence between the two periods, either spatial or temporal.

• the “Urnfield” period (E4) overlaps with the “Hallstatt” period (E4)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the “Urnfield” period (E4) overlaps with the “Hallstatt” period (E4)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the “Urnfield” period (E4) overlaps with the “Hallstatt” period (E4)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This symmetric property allows instances of E4 Period that overlap both temporally and spatially to be related, i,e. they share some spatio-temporal extent.

This property does not imply any ordering or sequence between the two periods, either spatial or temporal.

• the “Urnfield” period (E4) overlaps with the “Hallstatt” period (E4)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the “Urnfield” period (E4) overlaps with the “Hallstatt” period (E4)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This symmetric property allows instances of E4 Period that overlap both temporally and spatially to be related, i,e. they share some spatio-temporal extent.

This property does not imply any ordering or sequence between the two periods, either spatial or temporal.

• the “Urnfield” period (E4) overlaps with the “Hallstatt” period (E4)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the “Urnfield” period (E4) overlaps with the “Hallstatt” period (E4)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the “Urnfield” period (E4) overlaps with the “Hallstatt” period (E4)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This symmetric property associates two instances of E92 Spacetime Volume that have some of their extents in common. If only the fuzzy boundaries of the instances of E92 Spacetime Volume overlap, this property cannot be determined from observation alone and therefore should not be applied. However, there may be other forms of justification that the two instances of E92 Spacetime Volume must have some of their extents in common regardless of where and when precisely.

If this property holds for two instances of E92 Spacetime Volume then it cannot be the case that P133 is spatiotemporally separated from also holds for the same two instances. Furthermore, there are cases where neither P132 spatiotemporally overlaps with nor P133 is spatiotemporally separated from holds between two instances of E92 Spacetime Volume. This would occur where only an overlap of the fuzzy boundaries of the two instances of E92 Spacetime Volume occurs and no other evidence is available.

This property is symmetric

• The “Urnfield” period (E4) spatiotemporally overlaps with the “Hallstatt” period (E4. (Gimbutas, 1965)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the “Urnfield” period (E4) overlaps with the “Hallstatt” period (E4) (Gimbutas, 1965)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the “Urnfield” period (E4) overlaps with the “Hallstatt” period (E4)
• (E78) Yale Peabody Collection of Artefacts P132 overlaps with (E27) Cuzco Museum [after repatriation]
• Catedral de Nuestra Señora de la Asunción (E92) spatiotemporally overlaps with Great Mosque of Córdoba (E92)
• The facade of the Roman temple acquired by Hearst (E92) spatiotemporally overlaps with the Hearst Neptune Pool (E92)

   

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This symmetric property allows instances of E4 Period that do not overlap both temporally and spatially, to be related i,e. they do not share any spatio-temporal extent.

This property does not imply any ordering or sequence between the two periods either spatial or temporal.

• the “Hallstatt” period (E4) is separated from the “La Tène” era (E4)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the “Hallstatt” period (E4) is separated from the “La Tène” era (E4)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the “Hallstatt” period (E4) is separated from the “La Tène” era (E4)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This symmetric property allows instances of E4 Period that do not overlap both temporally and spatially, to be related i,e. they do not share any spatio-temporal extent.

This property does not imply any ordering or sequence between the two periods either spatial or temporal.

• the “Hallstatt” period (E4) is separated from the “La Tène” era (E4)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the “Hallstatt” period (E4) is separated from the “La Tène” era (E4)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This symmetric property allows instances of E4 Period that do not overlap both temporally and spatially, to be related i,e. they do not share any spatio-temporal extent.

This property does not imply any ordering or sequence between the two periods either spatial or temporal.

• the “Hallstatt” period (E4) is separated from the “La Tène” era (E4)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the “Hallstatt” period (E4) is separated from the “La Tène” era (E4)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

•  the “Hallstatt” period (E4) is separated from the “La Tène” era (E4)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This symmetric property associates two instances of E92 Spacetime Volume that have no extents in common. If only the fuzzy boundaries of the instances of E92 Spacetime Volume overlap, this property cannot be determined from observation alone and therefore should not be applied. However, there may be other forms of justification that the two instances of E92 Spacetime Volume must not have any of their extents in common regardless of where and when precisely.

If this property holds for two instances of E92 Spacetime Volume then it cannot be the case that P132 spatiotemporally overlaps with also holds for the same two instances. Furthermore, there are cases where neither P132 spatiotemporally overlaps with nor P133 is spatiotemporally separated from holds between two instances of E92 Spacetime Volume. This would occur where only an overlap of the fuzzy boundaries of the two instances of E92 Spacetime Volume occurs and no other evidence is available.

This property is not transitive. This property is symmetric.

• The “Hallstatt” period (E4) is spatiotemporally separated from the “La Tène” era (E4). (Marion, 2004)
• Kingdom of Greece (1831-1924) (E92) is spatiotemporally separated from Ottoman Empire (1299-1922) (E92).
• The path of the army of Alexander the Great (335-323 B.C.) (E7) is spatiotemporally separated from the Mauryan Empire (E4). (Lane Fox, 2004)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• the “Hallstatt” period (E4) is spatiotemporally separated from the “La Tène” era (E4) (Marion, 2004)

• Kingdom of Greece (1831-1924) (E92) is spatiotemporally separated fromOttoman Empire (1299-1922) (E92)

• The path of the army of Alexander (335-323 B.C.) (E92) is spatiotemporally separated fromthe Mauryan Empire (E92) (Lane Fox, 2004)

Quantification: many to many (0,n:0,n)
Scope note:

• (E22) Parthenon Marbles P133 is separated from (E27) Acropolis Museum [through expropriation]

• Kingdom of Greece (1831-1924) (E92) is spatiotemporally separated from Ottoman Empire (1299-1922) (E92)

• The path of the army of Alexander (335-323 B.C.) (E92) is spatiotemporally separated from the Mauryan Empire (E92)

Quantification: many to many (0,n,0,n)
Scope note:

This property associates two instances of E7 Activity, where the domain is considered as an intentional continuation of the range. A continuation of an activity may happen when the continued activity is still ongoing or after the continued activity has completely ended. The continuing activity may have started already before it decided to continue the other one. Continuation implies a coherence of intentions and outcomes of the involved activities.

This property is not transitive.

• The construction of the Kölner Dom (Cologne Cathedral) , abandoned in the 15th century (E7), was continued by construction in the 19th century (E7). [The construction in the 19^th century adapted the initial plans so as to preserve the intended appearance.] (Wolff, 1999)