Issue 623: Editorial check of CRMsci examples

ID: 
623
Starting Date: 
2022-11-07
Working Group: 
1
Status: 
Open
Background: 

The CRMsci editors have identified a number of examples that need revising. 

"Problematic" examples, where property labels randomly shift from the present to the past tense (f.i. O7, O13), have been marked as "not revised" (anyhting in highlight) or simply "missing".

Classes/ properties whose examples need be revised include: S9, S15, S20, S22, S23, O3, O4, O5, O6, O8, Ο10, Ο11, Ο13, Ο15, Ο17, Ο18, Ο19, Ο20, Ο21, Ο23, Ο25

Post by Thanasis Velios (4 November 2022)

Dear all,

Athina and I are making some progress with version 2.0 of CRMsci and we have identified some inconsistencies with property labels in the past and present tenses. Typically, the labels are in the present tense and the examples using the properties are in the past tense.

These are:

O7 contains or contained
O13 triggers or triggered

Is anyone aware of any relevant guidelines? From our understanding from CRMbase it seems that it should be O13 triggered and O7 confines. Please share any comments.

I think this also relates to the issue of temporal validity of properties.

All the best,

Thanasis
 

Post by Athina Kritsotaki (22 November 2022)

Hello all,

  I reformulate the issue, adding background information regarding a few classes, that would be helpful for the discussion:

Problematic" examples randomly shift from the present to the past tense (f.i. O7, O13), have been marked as "not revised" (anyhting in highlight) or simply "missing".

Classes/ properties whose examples need be revised include:
S9 (S9 Property Type: issue 332: It is postponed, it should be considered together with the issue related to redoing S4 - the review of the definition of this class has been postponed),
S15  (issue 332:It is postponed because the whole entity is under review),
S20 (issue 332: sig accepted the examples but asked Athina to improve the syntax of 4th example),
S22 (issue 332: the sig reviewed the scope note and decided to ask SS and MD to elaborate it further up to the next meeting. The example is rejected. We need an example of a ‘baulk’ from an archaeological record),
S23 (related to the open issue 612),
O3, O4, O5, O6, O8, Ο10, Ο11, Ο13, Ο15, Ο17, Ο18, Ο19, Ο20, Ο21, Ο23, Ο25

Athina