Post by Wolfgang Schmidle (22 February 2026)
Dear All,
I propose a new example for P46 as well as E13, P140, P141, P177: the “Antique Walrus Tusk Warrior Chessman” forms part of the Lewis Chessmen. I also propose replacing the “Fosseway” example in P46, and exchanging the domain and range in a CRMinf example.
See here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XKJTDvzErwRSs2XB0NOZucc4tFPzccXos5t…
Best,
Wolfgang
Post by Martin Doerr (22 February 2026)
Dear Wolfgang,
I support this proposal. Could be an e-vote?
Best,
Martin
Post by George Bruseker (22 February 2026)
I also think this is a positive improvement, gives context and is a clear case.
Post by Christian-Emil Ore (22 February 2026)
It is a nice example. But does "Antique Walrus Tusk Warrior Chessman" identify the object? By the way the chessmen were probably made in Trondheim, Norway.
Best,
Christian-Emil
Post by Martin Doerr (22 February 2026)
Dear Christian Emil,
Yes, I agree, I would normally add a few contextual properties in the identifying noun phrase, such as:
" The so-called "Lewis Chessmen" found on the Isle of Lewis in 1831" and the like for the newly found Warrior.
Best,
Martin
Post by Martin Doerr (22 February 2026)
I'd use some facts from this phase:
"The object will go on display in Edinburgh on Tuesday and in London just before the auction on 2 July, with Mr Kader saying it could be bought by, or be loaned to, a museum." and Southeby to contextualze "Antique Walrus Tusk Warrior Chessman" ...
Post by Stephen Stead (25 February 2026)
Nice work
Stephen Stead