Posted by Martin on 18/9/2018
Dear All,
I wonder if the scope note of J2 concluded that should be:
Scope note: " This property associates an instance of I2 Belief with the instance of I1 Argumentation that concluded it."
Or should be:
Scope note: " This property associates an instance of I2 Belief with the instance of I1 Argumentation that concluded or confirmed it."
or if confirming a belief is a generalization of concluding a belief, a possible result of an Argument.
Note that any change of a belief value is a new belief.
We should discuss the logic of sharing beliefs.
In the 42nd joined meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 and the 35th FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the crm-sig reviewed and accepted the new scope for J2 concluded by MD, plus the new domain proposed for the property. The reasoning backing these changes is that (i) an argument does not necessarily start a belief; it may either confirm it, if the value of the belief does not change, or it may cause it to change –i.e. result in a new conviction. The old and the new text is here
The issue is closed
Berlin, November 2018