Trying to apply CRMinf in a real example of an archaelogical excavation, it is noted that they quantification of the properties is missing.
Martin 1/12/2016
In the 37th joined meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 and the 30th FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the crm-sig assigned to Steve CEO and Wolfgang to specify the quantifications and the temporal constraints. Also they should take into account the new temporal properties.
Berlin, December 2016
Posted by Christian Emil on 28/3/2017
In the 37th joined meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 and the 30th FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the crm-sig assigned to Steve CEO and Wolfgang to specify the quantifications and the temporal constraints. Also they should take into account the new temporal properties.
I sent you a draft earlier and got some comments by Martin. The attached document is a hopefully better. I have adjusted some of the quantification and written new comments. The FOL statements are as before. I have also suggested that I1 Argumentation should not be a subclass of E13 Attribute Assignment.
Belief is currently a subclass of E2 Temporal Entity. That is, it has no spatial component. I cannot see why it should?
In the 40th joined meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 and the 33nd FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting the crm-sig assigned to MD to review CEOs work and by next meeting, MD will give a feedback. The CEO’s HW has been posted on the cidoc-crm site in http://www.cidoc-crm.org/Issue/ID-320-quantification-of-properties-in-crminf since 28/3/2017
Cologne, January 2018
In the 44th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 37th FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig reviewed CEO’s HW on the quantification of CRMinf properties and accepted his proposal. SS is to update the document of CRMinf accordingly. Issue is closed.
HW: SS is to update the document of CRMinf accordingly
Paris, June 2019