Issue 8: Do physical feature and its decomposition need to be more rigidly defined?
Do physical feature and its decompositon need to be more rigidly defined?
In scope, done.
In version 3.0, the property:
E19 Physical Object. is composed of (forms part of): Physical Object
has been redirected to:
E18 Physical Stuff. is composed of (forms part of): Physical Stuff In order to include "E26 Physical Feature".