The CRMgeo maintainers have tried to reformulate CRMgeo as an extension of CRM 7.1.2. This issue is for relevant discussions.
A summary of the proposed changes can be found here. See here for an overview of the model.
Post by Elias Tzortzakakis (16 February 2024)
Dear all,
The proposed changes have been applied in the most recent version of CRMgeo 1.2 and the rdf outcome is available here.
Note that these encodings have been created in order to assist the preparation of the next CRMgeo version and can only be used as DRAFT. Scope notes may still refer to deprecated classes.
Best,
Elias Tzortzakakis
In the 58th CIDOC CRM & 51st FRBR/LRMoo SIG meeting, upon discussing issue 676, the SIG decided to keep properties Q10, Q14, and Q16 from CRMgeo.
Paris, March 2024
Post by Gerald Hiebel (26 September 2025)
Dear All,
Martin and I have been working on a proposal for Issue: 674 - Harmonizing CRMgeo with CRMbase v7.1.2.
Please find attached the drawio diagram and the word document stating the changes. Once approved be CRMSIG we would write a new Word document that could be parsed by Elias to create an RDF version.
Any comments or suggestions welcome,
Best,
Gerald
In the 61st joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 & 54th FRBR/LRMoo SIG, the group reviewed the HW by GH & MD. For a graphical representation of the model see here. The proposed changes can be found in the attached document.
Decision: A small subgroup was formed (GH, GB, WS, and anyone else interested) to redraft the scope notes, and the introduction.
For an overview of the points raised in the discussion see here.
Heraklion, October 2025