Issue 532: The cardinality of AP13.2 is justified by (is justification of)
In the 49th CIDOC CRM and 42nd FRBR CRM sig meeting (virtual), Upon discussing issue 480, the sig decided to start a new issue where to discuss the cardinality of AP13.2 is justified by (is justification of) -formerly known as AP14.
March 2021
In the 51st CIDOC CRM & 44th FRBRoo SIG meeting, the SIG reviewed the proposal to change the cardinality of Ap13.2 justified (is justified by) back to one-to-many (0,n:0,1)on the grounds that one result (physical relation btw stratigraphic units) cannot have multiple causes of a given type.
Also The SIG decided to start a new issue, to discuss the section where cardinalities of typed properties (.1/.2) should appear in the CIDOC CRM document.
Nb. If cardinalities for typed properties are not to be defined on a one-by-one basis, this calls for drafting a text settling them in the introduction section.
Otherwise, a template is needed for adding cardinality constraints to the definitions of typed properties, for the properties that have them.
Issue closed