Post by Jutta Lindenthal (13 November 2024)
Dear All
In the context of the subject “About the relationship between symmetry and transitivity”, I noticed a few issues concerning P127 and P150, in particular, lost links and possible inconsistencies with ISO 25964-1:2011.
In case this is considered relevant, please find some notes and suggestions
in a downloadable PDF file:
https://nc.balilabs.de/index.php/s/ZyHJdDZHXmPJbqZ
Best,
Jutta
Post by Martin Doerr (13 November 2024)
Dear Jutta, All
Of course this is relevant, thank you very much!
Please send me a link to the text in an editable format. Transitivity between universals is a tricky thing, often deceiving intuition.
Anybody interested in participating in this discussion?
As a quick remark, I would not change "This property associates", because it is a stereotype we prefer throughout the document.
All the best,
Martin
Post by Jutta Lindenthal (14 November 2024)
Dear Martin, All
Many thanks for the response!
- Transitivity between universals is a tricky thing, often deceiving intuition.
Yes, it is. All the more so because the existing vocabularies rarely fulfill the conditions for logical, transitive relations.
Please find a docx file here https://nc.balilabs.de/index.php/s/GoBwYrNnapHRjLn
and a Google Doc https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bduGhrf3_6eW7kVBNnmyBUQCgxcj4GODGVK…
- As a quick remark, I would not change "This property associates", because it is a stereotype we prefer throughout the document.
Yes, I see. I removed the suggestion in the document.
All the best,
Jutta