Issue 533: How to disambiguate polysemous concepts used as ontological classes
In the 49th CIDOC CRM and 42nd FRBR CRM sig meeting (virtual), upon resolving issue 368, the sig assigned AF to redraft the use case of unpacking the polysemous concept "inscripition" into semantically distinct classes, to form part of the Modelling Principles document (see issue 351).
Post by Achille Felicetti (17 June 2021)
Please find enclosed my HW for issue 533 (disambiguation of polysemous concepts used as ontological classes).
This document is also available in the related folder of the "Issues; Working Documents” shared drive (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JhXMH3z8FW55XcyQcQ-XNud1jctTQ-naOf6V...).
I have reshaped the reasoning about “inscription” and its polysemic value as discussed during last SIG under issue 368.
The content can be freely condensed, integrated or adapted to be used as contribution to the Modelling Principles documentation (—> issue 351).
Post by Martin Doerr (21 November 2022)
See Achille's and my homework for Issue 533, to be added to the modelling principles as real life example from CRM SIG discussions.