The first sentence of the scope note of E31 might be deemed more fitting for E89 Propositional Object than for E31 Document. Are these two classes redundant? If so, which one is really needed in the model? If not, how could the scope note be reworded?
Patrick Le Boeuf
Helsinki 28/1/2010
Change the scope note of E89
Scope note:
from:
This class comprises immaterial items, including but not limited to stories, plots, procedural prescriptions, algorithms, laws of physics or images that are, or represent in some sense, sets of propositions about real or mental things and that are documented as single units or serve as topic of discourse.
to:
This class comprises immaterial items, including but not limited to stories, plots, procedural prescriptions, algorithms, laws of physics or images that are, or represent in some sense, sets of propositions about real or imaginary things and that are documented as single units or serve as topics of discourse.
The proposal accepted. Nuremberg December 2010