Issue 8: Do physical feature and its decomposition need to be more rigidly defined?

Starting Date: 
2001-07-05
Working Group: 
1
Status: 
Done
Closing Date: 
2002-07-05
Background: 

Do physical feature and its decompositon need to be more rigidly defined?

Current Proposal: 

In scope, done.

Outcome: 

In version 3.0, the property: 
E19 Physical Object. is composed of (forms part of): Physical Object
has been redirected to:
E18 Physical Stuff. is composed of (forms part of): Physical Stuff In order to include "E26 Physical Feature". 

Barcelona 5/7/2001