Issue 74: Collections have no owner

Starting Date: 
2002-01-18
Working Group: 
1
Status: 
Done
Closing Date: 
2002-02-22
Background: 

On implementing the new Collection entity, recognized that the ownership and custody links refer only to Physical Object.

Current Proposal: 

Now, once we regard Collections as non-objects in general, including sites and features, by sure they should by owned and kept. For Features in general I ask myself if "custody" makes sense. Probably yes, even though the keeper has to move to the site, rather than the object to the keepers facilities. An excavation site may have a keeper, as well as some rock paintings. So I propose to raise the domain of the ownerhip and custody links to Physical Stuff.
MD, 18 January 2002

Outcome: 

Proposal accepted, Monterey 22/2/2002.