Issue 478: Quantification of AP2 discarded into (was discarded by)
In the 46th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 39th FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting and upon reviewing the quantification of AP2, the sig decided to move this discussion in a new issue. The quantification of the property must explore the following possibilities:
(i) many instances of S11 Amount of Matter are removed and discarded into one heap (in which case it must be differentiated form O2 removed and from O5 removed (this one for sample taking).
(ii) the exact amount of matter that was removed in the course of an excavation process unit. However, if the amounts of matter are subsequently discarded in a heap, and this move is documented for some reason, then another property will have to be coined, that lumps the amounts of matter together.
(iii) the amount of matter discarded instantiates the heap, which means that AP2 should be used to document the excavation process units that fed into the heap.
Athens, February 2020
In the 49th joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and SO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 42nd FRBR – CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig decided in favor of the proposal to delete
- O2 removed [D: S1 Matter Removal, R: S11 Amount of Matter] from the list of subproperties of O1 diminished [D: S1 Matter Removal, R: S10 Material Substantial] AND
- O1 diminished [D: S1 Matter Removal, R: S10 Material Substantial] from the list of superproperties of O2 removed [D: S1 Matter Removal, R: S11 Amount of Matter]
to fix the inconsistency btw AP1 and AP2. Reaching a decision re. AP2 or introducing a 3rd property is considered premature at this stage. The issue will be discussed again in the next SIG meeting.