Issue 320: quantification of properties in CRMinf

Starting Date: 
2016-12-01
Working Group: 
3
Status: 
Open
Background: 

Trying to apply CRMinf  in a real example of an archaelogical excavation, it is noted that they quantification of the properties is missing.

Martin  1/12/2016

Current Proposal: 

In the 37th joined meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 and the 30th   FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the crm-sig assigned to  Steve   CEO and Wolfgang   to specify the quantifications and the temporal constraints. Also they should take into account the new temporal properties.

Berlin, December 2016

Posted by Christian Emil on 28/3/2017

In the 37th joined meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 and the 30th   FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the crm-sig assigned to  Steve   CEO and Wolfgang   to specify the quantifications and the temporal constraints. Also they should take into account the new temporal properties.

I sent you a draft earlier and got some comments by Martin. The attached document is a hopefully better. I have adjusted some of the quantification and written new comments.  The FOL statements are as before. I have also suggested that I1 Argumentation should not be a subclass of E13 Attribute Assignment.

Belief is currently a subclass of E2 Temporal Entity. That is, it has no spatial component.  I cannot see why it should?