Issue 293: Dimension

Starting Date: 
2015-10-07
Working Group: 
3
Status: 
Open
Background: 

Posted by Martin on 7/10/2015

Dear All,

Following todays discussion about business transactions we'll report later, it appears that the examples of E54 are not consistent:

E54 Dimension

Subclass of:         E1 CRM Entity

Scope note:         This class comprises quantifiable properties that can be measured by some calibrated means and can be approximated by values, i.e. points or regions in a mathematical or conceptual space, such as natural or real numbers, RGB values etc.

An instance of E54 Dimension represents the true quantity, independent from its numerical approximation, e.g. in inches or in cm. The properties of the class E54 Dimension allow for expressing the numerical approximation of the values of an instance of E54 Dimension. If the true values belong to a non-discrete space, such as spatial distances, it is recommended to record them as approximations by intervals or regions of indeterminacy enclosing the assumed true values. For instance, a length of 5 cm may be recorded as 4.5-5.5 cm, according to the precision of the respective observation. Note, that interoperability of values described in different units depends critically on the representation as value regions.

Numerical approximations in archaic instances of E58 Measurement Unit used in historical records should be preserved. Equivalents corresponding to current knowledge should be recorded as additional instances of E54 Dimension as appropriate.

Examples:          

§  currency: £26.00

§  length: 3.9-4.1 cm

§  diameter 26 mm

§  weight 150 lbs

§  density: 0.85 gm/cc

§  luminescence: 56 ISO lumens

§  tin content: 0.46 %

§  taille au garot: 5 hands

§  calibrated C14 date: 2460-2720 years, etc


An instance of E54 should for instance be : "silver cup 232 height (E54)" as in P40. 

Current Proposal: 

In the 36th joined meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 and the 29th FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the crm-sig discussed about the comment of the last meeting that an instance  of the dimension is NOT the unit and amount but the  actual dimension of a thing, assigned HW to GB to propose new examples by Thursday. Also it is mentioned that currently E16 Measurement can be used for measuring an instance of E1 CRM Entity BUT this is inconsistent with S4 Observation.O8 observed: S15 Observable Entity which is narrower since S4 Observation is superclass of E16 Measurement. Current definition of E16 Measurement gives unintended models. This incompatibility could be resolved by moving  S15 Observable Entity  in CIDOC CRM core. The sig assigned HW to MD, CEO, Oyvind to work on this issue. MD will make proposal. Must consider what is not observable. To be considered at next SIG

Heraklion, 1/8/2016

posted by George on 21/10/2016

Homework 293.a

Examples for Dimension

The 250 metric ton weight of the Luxor Obelisk

The 5.17 m height of the statue of David by Michaelangelo

The 530.2 carats of the Great Star of Africa diamond

The AD1262-1312, 1303-1384 calibrated C14 date for the Shroud of Turin

The 33 m diameter of the Stonehenge Sarcen Circle

The 755.9 foot length of the sides of the Great Pyramid at Giza

In the 37th joined meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 and the 30th   FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the crm-sig accepted the examples provided by GB. It remain open the homework assignment of MD,CEO,Oyvind about moving S15 Observable entity to CIDOC CRM.

Berlin, December 2016

Posted by Christian Emil on 29/3/2017

Dear all,

I attach a ppt with diagrams

1)  Current situation in CRM and CRMSci​

2)  New Exx Observable Entity  in CRM moved from CRMSci

3)  New Exx Observable Entity in CRM and a possible CRMSci simplification
4)  New Exx Observable Entity – CRM adjustment
5)  Summing uo

 

Posted by Martin  on 29/3/2017

dear Christian-Emil,

Very nice! I only would put in slide 5 Observation between Measurement and E13,
and "measured" under "observed".

I think necessarily Measurement must be seen as a special case of Observation.

Posted by Christian Emil on 29/3/2017

It is ok. In the pure crm it is as today. When crm is extended with crmsci or when dealing with pure crmsci observation is put "in between".

Posted by Christian Emil on 30/3/2017

Here is an adjusted version with Martin's comments included.


Posted by Martin on 30/3/2017

Great!

Can you put it on a server, and send the link to the list?


Posted by Christian Emil on 30/3/2017

Dear all,

 

Please find my homework as a  ppt with diagrams​:

http://www.edd.uio.no/download/cidoc_crm/Issue-293-Move-S4-Observable-Entity_ceo.pptx

​​Main points:

1)  Current situation in CRM and CRMSci​

2)  New Exx Observable Entity  in CRM moved from CRMSci

3)  New Exx Observable Entity in CRM and a possible CRMSci simplification

4)  New Exx Observable Entity – CRM adjustment
5)  Summing up
 

 

In the 38th joined meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 and the 31st FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the crm-sig decided that it is needed to study carefully which of the currently proposed classes to fall under observable entity satisfy the observability criterion (observability  implies falsifiability by empirical means). The definition of observable entity should be clarified and it should be found what is not observable. Also consistency with CRMinf should be achieved. Homework assigned to Oyvind, Steve, George, CEO

Heraklion, April 2017

Reference to Issues: