Issue 283: Add superproperties to properties of CRMarcheo
In 33rd meeting the crm - sig decided reviewing the CRM archeo one of the comments was that it should be added suproperties to find the supeproperties / subproperties of CRMarcheo.
Nuremebrg May 2015
In the 36th joined meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 and the 29th FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting the discusion about finding supeproperties / subproperties of CRMarcheo was continued and it is observed that there are some inconsistencies. For example in order to be AP10 destroyed (was destroyed by) isA P13 destroyed (was destroyed), it should be A1 Excavation Process Unit isA E6 Destruction. This change is accepted
The crm-sig proposed the work on this continues and these will be sorted out through the process of making new editions and passing them to FORTH for presentation in RDFS format.
In the 40th joined meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 and the 33nd FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, HW is assigned to Achille and George to make a proposal about superproperties in CRMarchaeo.
Cologne, January 2018
In the 42nd joined meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 and the 35th FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, Achille presented his homework on supeproperties for CRMarchaeo properties. AF and GB who were assigned to find superproperties to the CRMarcheo properties, worked around the problem by proposing that A1 production be listed as a subclass of E81 Transformation. The crm-sig rejected this solution and proposed that a different solution be explored. AF should rework the solution, along the lines proposed in the meeting. Also, GB is assigned with consistently changing S16 to an updated E3 Condition State. The details of the discussion may be found here.
Berlin, November 2018
In the 43rd joint meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9; 36th FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting. Going through the new text for CRMarcheo, the sig discussed the proposal put forth by MD to declare A7 Embedding a subclass of R20 Rigid Physical Feature instead of E3 Condition State. This proposal is accepted by sig.
The sig decided that properties of CRMarcheo found below, need to be associated with appropriate superproperties:
• AP15 [is or contains remains of (is or has remains contained in) D: A2 Stratigraphic Volume Unit, R: S10 Material Substantial],
• AP19 is embedding in *contains embedding) [D: A7 Embedding, R: A2 Stratigraphic Volume Unit],
• AP20 is embedding at (contains) [D:A7 Embedding, R: E53: Place], and
• AP21 contains (is contained in) [D: A2 Stratigraphic Volume Unit, R: E18 Physical Thing]
HW: CEO is to update the text of CRMarcheo and edit A7 and relevant properties, add superproperties to properties of CRMarcheo that are still missing and check whether properties AP11 has physical relation (is physical relation of), AP13 has stratigraphic relation (is stratigraphic relation of) and AP14 justified by (is justification of) map to CRMinf properties.
Heraklion, March 2019