Issue 213: missing property?
Posted by Christian Emil Ore, 5/07/2012
We once had an assistant working in the coin collection. He issued identifiers (E15 and P37) but forgot to place them under the correct coins in the trays...
E13 Attribute Assignment
P140 assigned attribute to (was attributed by): E1 CRM Entity
P141 assigned (was assigned by): E1 CRM Entity
E14 Condition Assessment
P34 concerned (was assessed by): E18 Physical Thing
P35 has identified (identified by): E3 Condition State
E15 Identifier Assignment
P37 assigned (was assigned by): E42 Identifier
P38 deassigned (was deassigned by): E42 Identifier
P142 used constituent (was used in): E41 Appellation
P39 measured (was measured by): E70 Thing
P40 observed dimension (was observed in): E54 Dimension
E17 Type Assignment
P41 classified (was classified by): E1 CRM Entity
P42 assigned (was assigned by): E55 Type
E14, E15, E16 and E17 are subclasses of E13
P34, P39, P41 are subproperties of P140.
There is no subproperty of P140 for E15. One may of course use P140 instead. From such a point of view P34, P39, P41 are superfluous as well.
The asymmetry is due to the fact that, in contrast to the other cases mentioned above, except for E17, there is no restriction of range to the use of P140 for domains being instances of E15.